BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai644Delhi453Chennai275Kolkata253Bangalore201Jaipur93Ahmedabad87Chandigarh67Hyderabad53Pune52Raipur47Indore39Rajkot38Cochin25Nagpur23Cuttack22Agra21Allahabad21Amritsar19Patna18Lucknow15Surat13Jodhpur13Karnataka10Dehradun7Visakhapatnam7Ranchi3Guwahati3Calcutta3SC2Himachal Pradesh2Kerala1Telangana1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1Rajasthan1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 26314Section 1477Section 1515Section 143(3)4Section 684Reassessment3Section 260A2Section 1312Addition to Income2Revision u/s 263

JNJ FINANCE COMPANY PVT LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-I

Appeal stands dismissed

ITAT/219/2015HC Calcutta11 May 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 11Th May, 2022. Appearance : Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv. …For Appellant Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal By The Assessee Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act For Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Dated August 10, 2015, Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata In I.T.A. No. 888/Kol/2014 For The Assessment Year 2008- 09. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :- I) Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Tribunal Is Correct In Law & On Facts In Holding That The Order Dated 27.12.2010 Passed In Pursuance Of The Proceedings U/S 147 On Specific Issue & Wherein The Subject Matter Of The Share

Section 147Section 260ASection 263Section 68

revised u/s 263 and as such the order u/s 263 is barred by limitation? ii) Whether the Learned Tribunal was justified in holding that the first proviso to section 68, which has been inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 with effect from 01.04.2013, applies to the assessment year 2008-09? iii) Whether the Learned Tribunal has in effect given

2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. PEARL TRACOM PVT LTD

ITAT/240/2024HC Calcutta01 Jul 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

For Appellant: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwalla, Advocate
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 260ASection 263

reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 pending proceedings u/s. 154?” We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant/department and Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwalla, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. The assessee preferred appeal before the learned Tribunal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata-21 [CIT(A)] dated 20.3.2023 by which

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S DANIEL COMMODITIES PRIVATE LIMITED

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/155/2025HC Calcutta14 Jan 2026

Bench: : The Hon'Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj & The Hon’Ble Justice Uday Kumar Date : 14Th January, 2026

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 151Section 263Section 68

reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 of the Act was without jurisdiction and, therefore, the same was non-est. He has submitted that the subsequent revision order passed by the ld. PCIT u/s 263