Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,482 Mumbai1,475 Bangalore439 Ahmedabad375 Chennai344 Kolkata340 Jaipur313 Hyderabad211 Pune183 Raipur116 Rajkot115 Indore105 Chandigarh103 Cuttack65 Surat60 Cochin60 Nagpur59 Lucknow50 Ranchi48 Agra47 Patna47 Karnataka42 Amritsar41 Guwahati40 Visakhapatnam30 Dehradun30 Allahabad26 SC24 Jodhpur21 Telangana21 Panaji10 Calcutta6 Jabalpur5 Orissa4 Varanasi4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3 Rajasthan1 J&K1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 Uttarakhand1 Kerala1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 153A4 Section 132(4)2 Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-17, KOLKATA vs. M/S. RADHASHYAM TIRTHABASI PAUL

ITA/106/2018HC Calcutta17 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

reassessment or collection was not in accordance with law and such tax, interest, late fee or penalty levied, assessed, reassessed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. AGR AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD

ITAT/128/2018HC Calcutta13 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

reassessment or collection was not in accordance with law and such tax, interest, late fee or penalty levied, assessed, reassessed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. LAST PEAK DATA PRIVATE LIMITED

ITAT/106/2018HC Calcutta26 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

reassessment or collection was not in accordance with law and such tax, interest, late fee or penalty levied, assessed, reassessed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. PARAMOUNT PROPERTIES & ESTATE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

ITAT/108/2018HC Calcutta05 Feb 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

reassessment or collection was not in accordance with law and such tax, interest, late fee or penalty levied, assessed, reassessed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment and the said order contains a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings under clause (c) of sub-section (1), such

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9,KOLKATA vs. MANJU OSATWAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/96/2021HC Calcutta11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Swapna Das, Adv

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 180Section 182Section 260ASection 263

penalty referred to in Section 182 by the date specified under sub Section (1) of Section 184. Section 189 states that the declarant under the scheme shall not be 6 entitled, in respect of undisclosed income declared or any amount of tax and surcharge paid thereon, to reopen any assessment or reassessment