BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,670Mumbai1,285Chennai548Jaipur445Ahmedabad437Kolkata370Bangalore354Hyderabad242Pune240Indore170Amritsar161Chandigarh160Surat141Rajkot127Visakhapatnam122Nagpur89Cochin89Raipur88Agra73Patna61Guwahati46Cuttack45Lucknow44Jodhpur31Allahabad25Jabalpur9Varanasi9Ranchi8Dehradun7Telangana7Panaji5SC4Calcutta4Karnataka3Orissa3Rajasthan2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 148A4Section 271(1)(c)4Section 153A4Addition to Income4Section 1483Section 143(3)3Section 260A2Section 132(4)2Section 1472

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. ARSHIA GLOBAL TRADECOM PRIVATE LIMITED

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is allowed

ITAT/175/2021HC Calcutta13 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260ASection 68

reassessment proceedings, the assessee was unable to justify the genuineness of the transactions. The assessee failed to produce original cash memos and bills for the sales alleged to have been effected and to substantiate the cash deposit

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI vs. M/S VODAFONE IDEA LTD

Cash Deposit2
Reassessment2
Undisclosed Income2

In the result, the appeal (APO/2/2023) is allowed and

ITAT/2/2023HC Calcutta01 Feb 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 5Th April, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Pranit Bag Adv. Mr. Anujit Mookherji, Adv. ...For The Appellant Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ...For The Respondent. The Court : This Intra-Court Appeal By The Writ Petitioner Is Directed Against The Order Dated 28Th November, 2022 In Wpo/2571/2022. The Appellant Had Filed The Writ Petition Challenging An Order Passed Under Section 148A(D) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The ‘Act’) & The Consequential Notice Issued Under Section 148 Of The Act. The Learned Single Bench Dismissed The Writ Petition On The Ground That The Order Has Not Been Passed By An

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 148Section 148A

cash deposits and, therefore, the assessment was rightly reopened and the objection filed by the assessee was duly considered and the order has been passed and the assessee has to face the reassessment

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. RAM RATAN MODI

ITAT/157/2022HC Calcutta13 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE T.S. SIVAGNANAM, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 158BSection 260A

reassessment order of 30.03.2000 in the case of M/s. SWC which is not the case of the Second AO and so the finding of AO is per se contradictory and in this context the Ld. A.R. explained that in the case of M/s. SWC in the first round the AO noted that M/s. SWC has deposited Rs. 89.2 crores

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

cash receipt from S.K Naredi for Rs.10,00,000/- while filing the original return u/s 139(1) on 31-10-2007. g) Assessee admitted the undisclosed income only when the irrefutable evidences like pages 3, 4 & 15 of the loose bunch marked TPS-9, printout of laptop, Recordings of Computer Hard disk. Audited Balance Sheet