35 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Unexplained Investmentclear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2
In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
271 SC ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 63 of 150 Lakshmangarh Estate & Trading Co. Ltd.68 dated 7th October, 2017. Reliance was placed on the decision in CIT Versus Smt. Jamna Devi Agarwala69, wherein the Court had distinguished the decision in Sumati Dayal. In support of his contention that the transactions were genuine as documents were produced