35 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 2(22)(e)clear
Sorted by relevance
Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2
In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
E), Kolkata Versus Mayapur Dham Pilgrim and Visitors Trust in ITAT NO. 312 of 2017 dated 16.02.2022. 24. To explain the concept of commercial expediency as to how the assessing officer cannot sit in the chair of the assessee, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.A. Builders Versus CIT (Appeals) 49. Reliance