BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “house property”+ Section 50clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,603Mumbai2,603Bangalore906Karnataka630Chennai628Jaipur537Ahmedabad530Hyderabad444Kolkata374Pune293Chandigarh274Surat226Indore211Cochin189Telangana150Visakhapatnam143Rajkot110Raipur100Lucknow84Amritsar78Nagpur68Calcutta58Cuttack51SC48Jodhpur38Agra36Patna32Guwahati32Dehradun26Rajasthan15Varanasi14Allahabad10Orissa7Kerala7Jabalpur5Panaji4Ranchi3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1385Section 343Section 36(1)3Section 203Section 272Section 36(2)2Section 3132Addition to Income2

SURENDRA COMMERCIAL & EXIM PVT. LD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8 (4), KOL

ITA/45/2010HC Calcutta13 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 20Section 313Section 374

house and asked him to report to the police station to which his wife (DW2) objected and then DW1 was asked to sign on a paper. So, as per submission of the learned Advocate that it would be apparent that this accused person has been falsely implicated and picked up from his residence by the police personnel

M/S. OBEROI BUILDING & INVESTMENT (P) LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, KOLKATA & ANR.

The appeal is allowed

ITA/168/2010HC Calcutta15 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

For Respondent: - Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv
Section 22Section 269USection 27Section 28

50 years over the shopping space and considering the decision of the Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Poddar Cements Ltd. (1997) 226 ITR 625 (SC) and Section 27(iiib) of the Income Tax Act, the income derived by the assesse from letting out shopping space is to be assessed under the head “income from house property

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ITC LIMITED

Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/125/2018HC Calcutta27 Jun 2024

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

50-77 Page 2 of 77 A.F.R JUDGMENT Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.: 1. Heard Sri Om Narayan Rai, learned senior standing counsel assisted by Sri Prithu Dudheria, learned junior standing counsel for the appellant and Sri J.P. Khaitan, learned senior advocate assisted by Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, learned advocate for the respondent. Facts:- 2. The respondent assesse is engaged

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. CENTURY ENKA LIMITED

ITA/7/2020HC Calcutta27 Feb 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S V2 RETAIL LTD.

ITAT/18/2020HC Calcutta28 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. JAGANNATH BANWARILAL TEXOFABS PVT LTD

ITAT/9/2020HC Calcutta27 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. J.J.EXPORTERS LTD.

ITAT/5/2020HC Calcutta26 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. L D S CITY PROJECTS PVT LTD

ITAT/3/2020HC Calcutta21 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-1), KOLKATA vs. M/S. RUNGTA MINES LTD

ITA/13/2020HC Calcutta08 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TCG LIFESCIENCES LTD.

ITAT/10/2020HC Calcutta08 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S THE CALCUTTA TRAMWAYS COMPANY (1978) LTD.

ITAT/20/2020HC Calcutta04 Mar 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HEIGHT INSURANCE SERVICES LTD

ITAT/4/2020HC Calcutta16 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL CIT-14, KOLKATA vs. SHRI VISHWANATH GUPTA

ITA/21/2020HC Calcutta07 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

RAJESH JAJODIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 45 KOLKATA AND ORS

ITAT/26/2020HC Calcutta27 Aug 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

M/S SINGHI AND CO vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIII

ITA/15/2020HC Calcutta27 Apr 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

TCG LIFE SCIENCES PVT LTD vs. JOINT COMM OF INCOME TAX RANGE59 KOL AND ANR

ITA/26/2020HC Calcutta04 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD.

ITAT/17/2020HC Calcutta13 Jan 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

SHWETA CHHAWCHHARIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-12

ITAT/15/2020HC Calcutta21 Dec 2020

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI,HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA vs. ELECTROCAST SALES INDIA LTD.

ITAT/11/2020HC Calcutta18 Dec 2020

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI,HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

50 of 300 3.3 OCO/5/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 91 of 2020 filed by Arvind Kumar Newar and Nand Gopal Khaitan, being the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 4. APO NO. 95 OF 2020 Appeal filed by Birla Corporation Limited 4.1 OCO/16/2020 Cross Objection in A.P.O No. 95 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, being the respondent

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) KOLKATA vs. M/S ITD-ITD CEM JV (CONSORTIUM OF ITD-ITD CEMENTATION)

ITAT/195/2018HC Calcutta03 Aug 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 138Section 151Section 313

property in the name of the said company. However, the respondents did not take any resolution admitting the complainant as one of the Directors of the said company and delayed the matter. Over the said issue the complainant filed civil suit against the respondents/accused persons. On 30th September, 2012 they proposed the complainant for amicable settlement and handed over three