BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

57 results for “house property”+ Section 32(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,414Mumbai2,180Bangalore895Karnataka696Chennai477Kolkata344Jaipur335Hyderabad313Ahmedabad269Chandigarh195Surat167Telangana140Indore123Pune117Amritsar101Cochin78Raipur76Visakhapatnam75Rajkot74SC57Calcutta57Lucknow56Nagpur54Patna41Cuttack39Guwahati23Agra16Rajasthan15Jodhpur12Kerala9Allahabad8Orissa7Varanasi6Dehradun5Panaji4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Andhra Pradesh2Ranchi1Jabalpur1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Punjab & Haryana1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1385Section 343Section 36(1)3Section 272Section 36(2)2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PREMIER TIE UP PVT LTD

ITAT/81/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

For Respondent: Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Adv
Section 34Section 36(1)Section 36(2)

32 permitted under section 34 of the Act. Hence Section 12(2) and (5) must be strictly enforced and imposed in the instant case. 77. Given the very narrow scope of intervention with an award under Section 34, the rigours of Section 12 and the Fifth and Seventh Schedules must be strictly and compulsively imposed. Such strict, compulsive, and rigorous

M/S. OBEROI BUILDING & INVESTMENT (P) LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, KOLKATA & ANR.

The appeal is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 57 · Page 1 of 3

ITA/168/2010
HC Calcutta
15 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

For Respondent: - Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv
Section 22Section 269USection 27Section 28

Section 269UA(f) of the Act defining the word “transfer”; 10 held that the income derived by the assessee is “Income from House Property.” 12. While coming to the aforesaid conclusion, the ITAT has committed a manifest error of law to ignore the object and business activity of the appellant assessee company, and misunderstood the nature of transaction

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ITC LIMITED

Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/125/2018HC Calcutta27 Jun 2024

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter Page 5 of 77 referred to as ‘the Act, 1961’) relating to the assessment year 2006-07. 6. In appeal filed by the respondent ITC before the CIT[Appeal], the appeal was allowed and the receipt of the aforesaid amount of Rs.32.42 crores was held to be a capital receipt

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. SRI SATYA NARAYAN SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/168/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. JEMISH SHAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/57/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-SILIGURI vs. SHEKHAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/139/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. POOJA JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/87/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. SURAJ SAHANA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/41/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA KUMAR PARSURAMKA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/130/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. PRAKASHO DEVI SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/138/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,BURDWAN vs. BIJAYA TAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/122/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA vs. MUKTA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/44/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MUKESH SARAOGI (HUF)

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/76/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18, KOLKATA vs. SRI VIKASH GOEL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/85/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA vs. SMT. BABITA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/64/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. GITESH TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/154/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9, KOLKATA vs. PUSPA DEVI TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/150/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5,KOLKATA vs. SWATI BAJAJ

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/6/2022HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PR CIT 9, KOLKATA vs. MANISHA TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/155/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR PERIWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/136/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

32 AIR 1958 Bombay 143 33 (2004) 2 SCC 120 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 37 of 150 Court, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in C.C.A.P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax 34. The next submission was on the effect of Section