BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

61 results for “house property”+ Section 19(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,105Delhi3,062Bangalore1,106Karnataka741Chennai711Kolkata483Jaipur462Hyderabad402Ahmedabad366Chandigarh258Surat220Pune219Telangana173Indore166Cochin111Amritsar111Raipur87Rajkot86Visakhapatnam79Lucknow78Nagpur68SC64Calcutta61Cuttack53Patna39Agra33Guwahati29Rajasthan24Jodhpur20Varanasi18Allahabad14Kerala10Jabalpur8Dehradun7Orissa7Ranchi4Panaji4Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Himachal Pradesh1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 13(1)(e)8Section 13(2)6Section 1385Section 1094Section 203Section 343Section 36(1)3Addition to Income3Section 3132

M/S. OBEROI BUILDING & INVESTMENT (P) LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, KOLKATA & ANR.

The appeal is allowed

ITA/168/2010HC Calcutta15 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

For Respondent: - Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv
Section 22Section 269USection 27Section 28

4. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the appellant assessee had filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) which was allowed, holding that the income derived by the appellant assessee from letting out of shopping space to different persons is business income. Aggrieved with the order of CIT (A) the Income Tax Department had filed an appeal being

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ITC LIMITED

Showing 1–20 of 61 · Page 1 of 4

Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/125/2018HC Calcutta27 Jun 2024

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

4. Subsequently, the respondent entered with ELEL a settlement agreement dated 11.05.2005 under which civil litigations going on in certain civil suits and some other disputes were settled on a consideration of Rs.43.10 crores out of which the settlement amount relating to the licence in question as referable to the agreement dated 03.05.1986, was determined at Rs.32.42 crores which

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -II, KOLKATA vs. ASHOK KUMAR PODDAR

ITA/543/2008HC Calcutta19 Oct 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI,HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Section 132Section 260A

19 relating to the undisclosed business income of the assessee’s wife Smt. Prema Poddar. From the order of the assessing officer an appeal was preferred by the Commissioner before the Commission of Income Tax (Appeals). The assertion of the respondent assessee was that the seized documents did not belong to him, nor prepared by him and that the department

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. CENTURY ENKA LIMITED

ITA/7/2020HC Calcutta27 Feb 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S V2 RETAIL LTD.

ITAT/18/2020HC Calcutta28 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. JAGANNATH BANWARILAL TEXOFABS PVT LTD

ITAT/9/2020HC Calcutta27 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. J.J.EXPORTERS LTD.

ITAT/5/2020HC Calcutta26 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. L D S CITY PROJECTS PVT LTD

ITAT/3/2020HC Calcutta21 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-1), KOLKATA vs. M/S. RUNGTA MINES LTD

ITA/13/2020HC Calcutta08 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TCG LIFESCIENCES LTD.

ITAT/10/2020HC Calcutta08 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S THE CALCUTTA TRAMWAYS COMPANY (1978) LTD.

ITAT/20/2020HC Calcutta04 Mar 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HEIGHT INSURANCE SERVICES LTD

ITAT/4/2020HC Calcutta16 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL CIT-14, KOLKATA vs. SHRI VISHWANATH GUPTA

ITA/21/2020HC Calcutta07 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

RAJESH JAJODIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 45 KOLKATA AND ORS

ITAT/26/2020HC Calcutta27 Aug 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

M/S SINGHI AND CO vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIII

ITA/15/2020HC Calcutta27 Apr 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

TCG LIFE SCIENCES PVT LTD vs. JOINT COMM OF INCOME TAX RANGE59 KOL AND ANR

ITA/26/2020HC Calcutta04 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD.

ITAT/17/2020HC Calcutta13 Jan 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

SHWETA CHHAWCHHARIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-12

ITAT/15/2020HC Calcutta21 Dec 2020

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI,HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA vs. ELECTROCAST SALES INDIA LTD.

ITAT/11/2020HC Calcutta18 Dec 2020

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI,HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PREMIER TIE UP PVT LTD

ITAT/81/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

For Respondent: Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Adv
Section 34Section 36(1)Section 36(2)

19, 20 and 21 and has set out the various tests laid down by Courts, in England and in the United States of America. It would be gainful to reproduce some of the tests as set out by the Apex Court in the case of State of West Bengal v. Shivananda Pathak, (1998) 5 SCC 513. “25. Bias