BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

61 results for “house property”+ Section 19clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,122Delhi3,068Bangalore1,108Karnataka741Chennai714Kolkata486Jaipur464Hyderabad402Ahmedabad368Chandigarh258Pune221Surat220Telangana173Indore166Cochin111Amritsar111Rajkot87Raipur87Lucknow81Visakhapatnam80Nagpur68SC64Calcutta61Cuttack53Patna39Agra33Guwahati29Rajasthan24Jodhpur20Varanasi18Allahabad14Kerala10Jabalpur8Dehradun7Orissa7Ranchi4Panaji4Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Himachal Pradesh1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 13(1)(e)8Section 13(2)6Section 1385Section 1094Section 203Section 343Section 36(1)3Addition to Income3Section 3132

M/S. OBEROI BUILDING & INVESTMENT (P) LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, KOLKATA & ANR.

The appeal is allowed

ITA/168/2010HC Calcutta15 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

For Respondent: - Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv
Section 22Section 269USection 27Section 28

Section 24 (a) computed the income from house property at Rs. 9,73,182/-. 14. As per objects in the Memorandum of Association and also as per assessment order, the assessee is engaged in business of licensing the space in question. In this regard the findings recorded by the Assessing Officer in the Assessment Order is reproduced below:- “During

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ITC LIMITED

Showing 1–20 of 61 · Page 1 of 4

Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/125/2018HC Calcutta27 Jun 2024

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter Page 5 of 77 referred to as ‘the Act, 1961’) relating to the assessment year 2006-07. 6. In appeal filed by the respondent ITC before the CIT[Appeal], the appeal was allowed and the receipt of the aforesaid amount of Rs.32.42 crores was held to be a capital receipt

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) KOLKATA vs. M/S ITD-ITD CEM JV (CONSORTIUM OF ITD-ITD CEMENTATION)

ITAT/195/2018HC Calcutta03 Aug 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 138Section 151Section 313

property in the name of the said company. However, the respondents did not take any resolution admitting the complainant as one of the Directors of the said company and delayed the matter. Over the said issue the complainant filed civil suit against the respondents/accused persons. On 30th September, 2012 they proposed the complainant for amicable settlement and handed over three

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. CENTURY ENKA LIMITED

ITA/7/2020HC Calcutta27 Feb 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S V2 RETAIL LTD.

ITAT/18/2020HC Calcutta28 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. JAGANNATH BANWARILAL TEXOFABS PVT LTD

ITAT/9/2020HC Calcutta27 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. J.J.EXPORTERS LTD.

ITAT/5/2020HC Calcutta26 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. L D S CITY PROJECTS PVT LTD

ITAT/3/2020HC Calcutta21 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-1), KOLKATA vs. M/S. RUNGTA MINES LTD

ITA/13/2020HC Calcutta08 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TCG LIFESCIENCES LTD.

ITAT/10/2020HC Calcutta08 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S THE CALCUTTA TRAMWAYS COMPANY (1978) LTD.

ITAT/20/2020HC Calcutta04 Mar 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HEIGHT INSURANCE SERVICES LTD

ITAT/4/2020HC Calcutta16 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL CIT-14, KOLKATA vs. SHRI VISHWANATH GUPTA

ITA/21/2020HC Calcutta07 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

RAJESH JAJODIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 45 KOLKATA AND ORS

ITAT/26/2020HC Calcutta27 Aug 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

M/S SINGHI AND CO vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIII

ITA/15/2020HC Calcutta27 Apr 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

TCG LIFE SCIENCES PVT LTD vs. JOINT COMM OF INCOME TAX RANGE59 KOL AND ANR

ITA/26/2020HC Calcutta04 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD.

ITAT/17/2020HC Calcutta13 Jan 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

SHWETA CHHAWCHHARIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-12

ITAT/15/2020HC Calcutta21 Dec 2020

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI,HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA vs. ELECTROCAST SALES INDIA LTD.

ITAT/11/2020HC Calcutta18 Dec 2020

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI,HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

19 of 300 f. Ad interim orders in term of prayers above ; g. Such further and/or other order or orders be passed, direction or directions be given as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper. OCO/12/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O. No. 90 of 2020 filed by Pradip Kumar Khaitan, the respondent No. 5 OCO/21/2020 – Cross Objection in A.P.O

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. SMT SIKHA BAGARIA

The appeal is allowed and

ITAT/15/2022HC Calcutta16 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Respondent: Mr. Probal Kumar Mukherjee, Ld. Sr. Adv

house hold articles and cloths which are her absolute properties and when she was leading her nuptial life, then Mohanlal gave gold ornaments and other articles worth Rs. 50,000/-. 4. In or about 1995, Sanjay’s father came to Mohanlal with a proposal of Sanjay’s marriage with Madhu. At that time, Sanjay was preparing for pursuing