BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 36(1)(via)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai620Delhi533Chennai236Bangalore234Kolkata127Ahmedabad113Jaipur112Hyderabad82Chandigarh71Pune69Surat42Panaji35Indore30Cuttack27Cochin25Guwahati25Nagpur20Rajkot18Telangana16Amritsar15Jodhpur12Lucknow7Dehradun5SC5Visakhapatnam4Karnataka4Raipur4Calcutta3Varanasi3Allahabad2Ranchi1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA vs. UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIAL FUND LTD.

The appeal stands disposed of on

ITAT/359/2017HC Calcutta03 Jan 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date: January 3, 2022. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. Mr. A. Bhowmik, Adv. … For The Appellant/Revenue Mr. Sanjay Bbhowmick, Adv. Mr. A.K.Dey, Adv. … For The Respondent The Court : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act, In Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 24Th March, 2017, Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) In Ita No. 297/Kol/2014 For The Assessment Year 2010-11. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Our Consideration:

Section 14ASection 260ASection 36Section 36(1)

Via video conference] Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. Mr. A. Bhowmik, Adv. … for the appellant/revenue Mr. Sanjay Bbhowmick, Adv. Mr. A.K.Dey, Adv. … for the respondent The Court : This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, in brevity) is directed against the order dated 24th March, 2017, passed by the Income

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. SUMAN KUMAR

ITAT/128/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: :

via email on November 17, 2017. Reliance has been placed on balance confirmations forwarded by the appellant, which were never disputed by the distributors. 18 The Learned Senior Counsel also submitted that the employee had used his unlawful gains to make huge investments, acquire properties, and make dealings and transactions that exceeded his declared income. The declared income

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. SAJJADBHAI NURUDDIN NANDARBARWAL

ITAT/129/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: :

via email on November 17, 2017. Reliance has been placed on balance confirmations forwarded by the appellant, which were never disputed by the distributors. 18 The Learned Senior Counsel also submitted that the employee had used his unlawful gains to make huge investments, acquire properties, and make dealings and transactions that exceeded his declared income. The declared income