DEYS MEDICAL (U.P.) PRIVATE LIMITED vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA
ITAT/160/2024HC Calcutta18 Feb 2026
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR
Section 40
35,07,509/-. These payments were disallowed primarily because the
appellant failed to deduct Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) at the prescribed rates,
as mandated by law.
21.
The Tribunal carefully scrutinized the appellant’s assertion that these
payments were merely reimbursements and it clarified that such a
characterization was unfounded. Instead, the Tribunal concluded that these
were, in fact