BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

213 results for “disallowance”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai22,685Delhi17,116Chennai6,579Kolkata6,166Bangalore5,807Ahmedabad2,689Pune2,322Hyderabad1,692Jaipur1,463Surat1,041Indore974Chandigarh929Cochin816Karnataka795Raipur659Rajkot619Visakhapatnam559Nagpur504Lucknow452Amritsar440Cuttack383Panaji286Telangana225Jodhpur223Agra220Calcutta213Patna191Ranchi187Guwahati179SC153Dehradun144Jabalpur107Allahabad99Kerala76Varanasi59Punjab & Haryana41Orissa20Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh8A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7Uttarakhand2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1J&K1Bombay1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 260A79Disallowance58Section 26340Section 4036Addition to Income36Section 14A34Deduction31Section 143(3)17Section 80I13Section 35

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT), KOLKATA vs. M/S. CENTURY PLYBOARDS (I) LTD

ITA/159/2018HC Calcutta15 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Section 14ASection 260ASection 80I

section 14A(2) read with rule 8D of the Rules could be invoked it was pointed out that the Assessing Officer needs to record satisfaction that having regard to the kind of the assessee suo motu disallowance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT) KOLKATA vs. M/S CENTURY PLYBOARDS (I) LTD

ITA/65/2021HC Calcutta15 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Section 14A

Showing 1–20 of 213 · Page 1 of 11

...
12
Section 8011
Capital Gains6
Section 260A
Section 80I

section 14A(2) read with rule 8D of the Rules could be invoked it was pointed out that the Assessing Officer needs to record satisfaction that having regard to the kind of the assessee suo motu disallowance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT) KOLKATA vs. CENTURY PLYBOARDS (INDIA) LTD.

ITA/39/2021HC Calcutta15 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Section 14ASection 260ASection 80I

section 14A(2) read with rule 8D of the Rules could be invoked it was pointed out that the Assessing Officer needs to record satisfaction that having regard to the kind of the assessee suo motu disallowance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S SUVARNA COMMERCIAL PVT LTD

ITAT/65/2021HC Calcutta17 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 14ASection 260ASection 80I

section 14A(2) read with rule 8D of the Rules could be invoked it was pointed out that the Assessing Officer needs to record satisfaction that having regard to the kind of the assessee suo motu disallowance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5,KOKATA vs. M/S. L.G.W. LTD

ITA/35/2020HC Calcutta12 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : August 12, 2022 Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ….For Appellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act, For Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Of The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) Dated 5Th October, 2018 In I.T.A. No.1786/Kol/2016 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration: - A) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Tribunal Has Misinterpreted Section 194C, More Particularly 194C (7) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Read With Rule 31A Of The Income

Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 200Section 234Section 260ASection 31Section 31ASection 48Section 6

disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) read with Section 194C of the Act.” 14. Even assuming that the assessee had not furnished the particulars as required under Sub-Section (7) of Section 194C of the Act in the prescribed form, the maximum that could be done is to impose a fine of Rs.200/- for every day of such non compliance

KESORAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2, KOLKATA

The appeals are allowed and substantial

ITA/148/2018HC Calcutta19 Jan 2022

Bench: Us In These Two Appeals.

For Appellant: Mr. Debasish Chowdhury, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv
Section 10(34)Section 14ASection 260A

disallowance voluntarily made by the assessee was not acceptable. The assessee further contended that sub-section (2) of Section 14A does

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, KOLKATA vs. M/S. EIH LTD

ITAT/39/2020HC Calcutta17 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 14ASection 194HSection 195Section 2Section 2(47)Section 260ASection 40Section 50BSection 9(1)

section 2(42C) of the Income Tax Act? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned Tribunal erred in law in deleting the disallowance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S ITC LTD

ITAT/89/2025HC Calcutta21 Jul 2025

Bench: The Learned Tribunal – One By The Assessee & The Other By The Revenue Which Have Been Disposed Of By A Common Order, Impugned In This Appeal. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

For Appellant: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate
Section 14ASection 260ASection 37(1)Section 40a

disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, deduction under Section 801A, deduction under Section 80IC. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act by order dated 29.03.2014. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee preferred appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 2

DEYS MEDICAL (U.P.) PRIVATE LIMITED vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA

ITAT/160/2024HC Calcutta18 Feb 2026

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

Section 40

2,86,88,459/- towards sales promotion, advertisement and marketing expenses, as well as Rs.48,19,050/- towards handling, storage and collection charges under Section 40(a)(ia), is hereby affirmed. The questions framed being …. a) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the invocation of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for disallowance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA vs. MUKTA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/44/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA vs. SMT. BABITA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/64/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18, KOLKATA vs. SRI VIKASH GOEL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/85/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,BURDWAN vs. BIJAYA TAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/122/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-SILIGURI vs. SHEKHAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/139/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. SRI SATYA NARAYAN SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/168/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAJESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/26/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9, KOLKATA vs. PUSPA DEVI TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/150/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. AAYUSH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/88/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA KUMAR PARSURAMKA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/130/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MUKESH SARAOGI (HUF)

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/76/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

2 of 150 ITAT/42/2020 IA NO. GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA VERSUS TAPATI SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/43/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS SOUVIK SAHANA IA NO. GA/2/2020 IN ITAT/44/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA VERSUS MUKTA AGARWAL ITAT/64/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA