BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,137Mumbai948Chennai403Bangalore384Jaipur170Hyderabad147Cochin77Kolkata67Ahmedabad57Amritsar55Indore44Chandigarh41Guwahati41Allahabad37Pune34Nagpur28Karnataka25Rajkot22Lucknow20Surat16Raipur15Visakhapatnam14Agra11Dehradun11Kerala9Patna8Cuttack6Jodhpur5Calcutta3Rajasthan1Telangana1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 153C4Section 260A3Section 14A3Addition to Income3Section 32(1)(iia)2Section 2712Section 153A2Section 80I2Deduction

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. MONOJ KUMAR JAIN & SONS(HUF)

The appeal is allowed and the order passed by the

ITAT/131/2017HC Calcutta15 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: MR. Smarajit Roy Chowdhury, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khiatan, Sr. Adv
Section 132Section 143Section 153CSection 260ASection 271

153C cannot be said to be voluntary. With regard to the alleged defect in the notice issued under section 274 of the Act, either on the ground that the relevant portions have not been clearly indicated or that satisfaction of the Assessing Officer has not been properly made was not canvassed before the CIT[A]. This contention appears to have

2
Depreciation2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL-2,KOLKATA vs. M/S. DHANSAR ENGINEERING CO.PVT LTD.

In the result, we find that question no

ITAT/343/2017HC Calcutta14 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 14ASection 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(iia)Section 32A(2)(b)

153C of the Act. Thus, we find that there is no question of law much less substantial question of law arising for consideration on this issue. The second question is with regard to the claim for additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia). The Tribunal had taken note of the decision of this Court in the case

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. SHALIMAR PELLET FEEDS LTD.

In the result the appeals in so far as the assessment

ITAT/199/2018HC Calcutta07 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Ms. Sucharita Biswas, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv
Section 153ASection 260ASection 263Section 80I

disallowance of depreciation claim @ 30 % on lorry which are not used for hiring business ? (h) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned Tribunal has erred in quashing the order under Section 263 of the 4 Income Tax Act, 1961 thereby deleting the addition made under Section 153A/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in absence