BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 153A(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,249Mumbai2,122Chennai642Bangalore600Hyderabad436Jaipur289Kolkata206Ahmedabad131Chandigarh131Amritsar123Indore118Rajkot93Nagpur88Pune87Cochin84Visakhapatnam65Karnataka61Allahabad59Raipur57Surat47Guwahati42Patna31Lucknow29Agra26Jodhpur24Ranchi21Cuttack20Kerala14Dehradun12Telangana5Varanasi4Calcutta3Punjab & Haryana2SC2Gauhati2Jabalpur1Rajasthan1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 153A8Section 271(1)(c)4Section 260A3Section 2633Section 683Section 132(4)2Section 143(3)2Addition to Income2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT & TP) vs. M/S. DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/66/2018HC Calcutta09 Jul 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

153A only in pursuant to search for the A.Y. 2007-08. The submission of the assessee was considered and found to have no merit in the light of the provisions of the Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) inserted by the Finance Act 2007. The provisions are very clear that if any undisclosed income is found or declared after

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. SHRI SAWANKUMAR T JAJOO

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

ITAT/271/2024HC Calcutta17 Jan 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

1. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the order dated 13.03.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” Bench, Mumbai (the Tribunal) in ITA/6489/MUM/2018 for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for consideration

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S SALARPURIA PROPERTIES PVT LTD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of law are

ITAT/167/2023HC Calcutta30 Aug 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 30Th August, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …For Apellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akhilesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Indranil Banerjee, Adv. ….For Respondent

Section 148(3)Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 260ASection 263Section 80I

disallowed in Assessment year 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 ? II) Whether the Learned Tribunal has erred in law and in fact in overlooking that the Assessing Officer did not apply his mind in the assessment year 2010-11 which makes the order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue ?” The assessment for the year under consideration