BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai953Delhi845Bangalore553Kolkata401Chennai317Ahmedabad155Pune130Hyderabad117Jaipur60Karnataka50Lucknow38Chandigarh35Cuttack33Indore30Rajkot28Visakhapatnam25Surat25Cochin23Nagpur15Amritsar14Jodhpur12Agra10Telangana9Dehradun8Guwahati8Varanasi7Panaji6Patna5Raipur4Jabalpur3Calcutta2SC1Allahabad1Kerala1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1433Section 260A2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & TRA vs. JOY PARTNERSHIP MINING CENTRE

ITAT/71/2018HC Calcutta15 Nov 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 142Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260A

disallowance on depreciation and thus the net profit came to 5 Rs.77,41,629/-. The loss carried forward by the assessee from previous year was Rs.2,88,71,747/- and after adjusting the aforesaid net profit, the loss carried forward for the next year was Rs.2,11,30,118/-. In the admitted facts of the case, the respondent assessee

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. M/S JJ EXPORTS PVT. LTD

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground that the company has been wound up and

ITAT/54/2018
HC Calcutta
05 Sept 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : September 5, 2022. Appearance: Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. … For Appellant Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhertha Das, Adv. …For Respondent Ga/1/2018(Ga/554/2018) The Court : We Have Heard Ms. Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant & Ms. Swapna Das & Mr. Siddhertha Das, Learned Advocates For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 127 Days In Filing This Appeal. We Have Perused The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Application & We Find Sufficient Cause Has Not Been Shown To Prefer The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned.

Section 260ASection 92C

disallowance of Rs.14,60,01,803/- made by the assessing officer on the basis of observation of the Auditor in Column No. 17(1) of Tax Audit Report dated 30.10.2017? ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Tribunal has erred in law in accepting the additional evidence in the form of corrigendum issued