BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “disallowance”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,108Mumbai935Chennai512Bangalore292Kolkata232Ahmedabad100Jaipur80Chandigarh52Raipur47Karnataka39Amritsar37Indore32Hyderabad29Cuttack22Visakhapatnam21Pune21Rajkot21Cochin19Lucknow16Surat13SC13Guwahati11Varanasi11Panaji7Dehradun6Agra5Telangana4Nagpur4Kerala3Patna2Ranchi1Rajasthan1Calcutta1Allahabad1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 402

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1,KOLKATA vs. NISSIN ABC LOGISTICS P LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

ITAT/185/2022HC Calcutta15 Nov 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Dated : November 15, 2022. Appearance: Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …For Appellant Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. Gupta, Adv. Mr. I. Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent Ga/1/2022 The Court :- We Have Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Standing Counsel For The Appellant & Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 210 Days In Filing This Appeal. We Have Perused The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Petition & Found Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Condonation Of Delay. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned.

Section 260ASection 40Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) was upheld by the Tribunal vide order dated 5th April, 2019 in ITA No. 649/Kol/2017 holding that the amount paid by the assessee company to International Freight Forwarding Agent was neither covered under Section 9(1)(i) nor under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act and the same, therefore, did not construe