BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 68clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,924Delhi1,609Bangalore645Chennai396Kolkata337Ahmedabad278Jaipur178Hyderabad134Pune78Raipur72Chandigarh71Indore56Lucknow55Visakhapatnam41Ranchi38Karnataka34Rajkot30Surat29Nagpur25Cochin24Guwahati23SC19Jodhpur17Amritsar14Cuttack12Telangana9Agra7Patna6Kerala6Varanasi5Allahabad5Calcutta3Panaji2Rajasthan1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 80I4Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 92B2Section 682Section 14A2Section 115J2Section 22Deduction2Depreciation

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ITC LIMITED

Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/125/2018HC Calcutta27 Jun 2024

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

Section 32 of the Act 1961, held it to be a “license”. In the present set of facts the question of nomination or transfer of license is not involved. Even at the time of execution of the operating license agreement in question no amount was paid by ITC to ELEL as cost of acquisition of license. 19. M/S ELEL

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2, KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed and it is held that substantial

ITAT/67/2022HC Calcutta20 Dec 2022

Bench: :

Section 115JSection 143(3)
2
Section 14A
Section 260A
Section 68
Section 80I
Section 92B

section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, stating that the said ground was not relevant to the order of the lower authorities ? We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. J.P. Khaitan, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent/assessee. It is pointed out by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee that

PRINCIPAL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S SHALIMAR PELLET FEEDS LIMITED

In the result, the substantial questions of law framed

ITAT/29/2021HC Calcutta04 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 2Section 260ASection 40A(2)(b)Section 80I

Section 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to M/s. Shalimar Hatcheries Ltd. as submitted by the assessee itself ? v) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in allowing 30% depreciation amounting to 3 Rs.14,68