BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 41(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,815Delhi1,693Bangalore749Chennai542Kolkata348Ahmedabad289Hyderabad186Jaipur149Raipur133Chandigarh128Pune84Surat72Amritsar71Indore71Karnataka54Visakhapatnam50Lucknow42SC31Nagpur26Cochin25Rajkot23Guwahati22Ranchi22Cuttack22Telangana16Kerala15Allahabad10Dehradun9Agra7Jodhpur7Calcutta5Varanasi4Panaji4Rajasthan3Patna2Punjab & Haryana1Orissa1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Tripura1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 286Section 153C3Section 14A3Section 1433Depreciation3Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 32(1)(iia)2Deduction2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOL-III vs. M/S. KOTHARI GLOBAL LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/60/2014HC Calcutta30 Nov 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 263Section 28Section 41Section 41(1)

depreciation of the machine and not on the interest paid by it. 16) Moreover, the purchase effected from the Kaiser Jeep Corporation is in respect of plant, machinery and tooling equipments which are capital assets of the Respondent. It is important to note that the said purchase amount had not been debited to the trading account or to the profit

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & TRA vs. JOY PARTNERSHIP MINING CENTRE

ITAT/71/2018HC Calcutta
15 Nov 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 142Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260A

41,629/-. The loss carried forward by the assessee from previous year was Rs.2,88,71,747/- and after adjusting the aforesaid net profit, the loss carried forward for the next year was Rs.2,11,30,118/-. In the admitted facts of the case, the respondent assessee was liable to tax under Section 115JB of the Act, 1961. Therefore

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ITC LIMITED

Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/125/2018HC Calcutta27 Jun 2024

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

41 of 77 r(1)(e) any representation(s) / warranty(ies) of Elel as contained in the . Consent Terms being incomplete or incorrect; r(1)(f) all litigation referred to in Annexure E; r(1)(g) any claim of any of the Employees; r(1)(h) any claim of any statutory authority for non-payment of any fees relating

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX, ASANSOL vs. M/S EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and it is dismissed

ITAT/230/2017HC Calcutta14 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260Section 32Section 40A(9)

b) Whether of the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, ITAT 230 of 2017 Page 3 of 14 was justified in reversing the finding of CIT (Appeals) in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,35,87,000/- for A.Y. 2003-04 and Rs. 1

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL-2,KOLKATA vs. M/S. DHANSAR ENGINEERING CO.PVT LTD.

In the result, we find that question no

ITAT/343/2017HC Calcutta14 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 14ASection 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(iia)Section 32A(2)(b)

depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia). The Tribunal had taken note of the decision of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. G. S. Atwal & Company in 254 ITR 592 for the proposition that mining of coal is production. Applying the said decision the Tribunal granted relief to the assessee. This issue has also been settled