BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 132(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai889Delhi793Bangalore332Chennai155Kolkata104Jaipur101Ahmedabad101Hyderabad96Chandigarh90Amritsar49Pune45Raipur40Visakhapatnam31Karnataka26Cochin24Nagpur22Lucknow21Indore21Guwahati19SC14Rajkot13Surat13Cuttack13Kerala7Dehradun4Ranchi4Allahabad3Calcutta3Agra2Telangana2Rajasthan1Panaji1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Jodhpur1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1Patna1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Deduction3Depreciation3Disallowance3Section 92B2Section 682Section 14A2Section 115J2Revision u/s 2632

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2, KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed and it is held that substantial

ITAT/67/2022HC Calcutta20 Dec 2022

Bench: :

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 260ASection 68Section 80ISection 92B

section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, stating that the said ground was not relevant to the order of the lower authorities ? We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. J.P. Khaitan, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent/assessee. It is pointed out by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee that

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3, KOLKATA vs. M/S EIH LIMITED

In the result, the appeal (ITA/62/2018) is dismissed

ITA/62/2018HC Calcutta20 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

Section 143(3)

1. Heard Sri Prithu Dudheria, learned counsel for the appellant / Income Tax Department and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. 2. This appeal was admitted by order dated 08.06.2018, on the following substantial questions of law:- “[i] Whether the decision of the Tribunal in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer passed under Section

BHAG CHAND CHHABRA A HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 12

In the result, the appeal (ITA/62/2018) is dismissed

ITAT/62/2018HC Calcutta11 Nov 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 143(3)

1. Heard Sri Prithu Dudheria, learned counsel for the appellant / Income Tax Department and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. 2. This appeal was admitted by order dated 08.06.2018, on the following substantial questions of law:- “[i] Whether the decision of the Tribunal in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer passed under Section