BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai217Pune212Chennai207Ahmedabad205Jaipur145Kolkata107Delhi99Bangalore69Hyderabad57Surat39Chandigarh26Lucknow24Nagpur22Amritsar16Indore15Rajkot14Visakhapatnam8Agra7Jabalpur6Jodhpur6Panaji5Raipur4Cuttack4Allahabad3Cochin3Ranchi3Calcutta3SC2Guwahati2Varanasi1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 80G4Section 12A(1)4Section 148A3Section 22Section 2(15)2Charitable Trust2Exemption2

CIT (EXEMPTION) , KOLKATA vs. HARNARAYAN RAJDULARI DEVI TAPARIA - CHARITABALE TRUST

ITA/111/2019HC Calcutta01 Jul 2024

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act keeping in view the law governing the subject and pass a speaking order after hearing the assessee trust. 6. In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.” 9. In Director of Income Tax vs. Ophthalmic and Optometry Research Education Centre reported in 2013 ITR (355) 361 the Delhi High Court considered

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 KOLKATA vs. M/S. BRITANIA INDUSTRIES LTD

ITAT/111/2019HC Calcutta
25 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act keeping in view the law governing the subject and pass a speaking order after hearing the assessee trust. 6. In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.” 9. In Director of Income Tax vs. Ophthalmic and Optometry Research Education Centre reported in 2013 ITR (355) 361 the Delhi High Court considered

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. SAPPHIRE TRADE ASSOCIATES PVT LTD

The appeal is partly allowed and the assessment

ITAT/28/2025HC Calcutta21 Mar 2025

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date: 5Th May, 2025 Appearance: Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. Ms. Alisha Das, Adv. Mr. Om Prakash Prasad, Adv. Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Ms. Elina Dey, Adv. Mr. Sourendra Nath Banerjee, Adv. …For Appellants Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148A

condone the delay in filing the appeal. GA/1/2025 is allowed. As could be seen from the Memorandum of Appeal as well as the grounds raised in the writ petition, the appellants did not question the order passed under Section 148A(d) as well as the assessment order under Section 147 of the Act on the merits of the matter