BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 46Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi124Kolkata101Mumbai86Chennai78Amritsar62Hyderabad59Ahmedabad58Jaipur42Pune27Patna26Indore22Lucknow20Bangalore18Surat15Rajkot15Chandigarh12Cuttack10Visakhapatnam7Allahabad6Guwahati5Jodhpur4Calcutta4Agra4Cochin3Raipur2Varanasi2Jabalpur2Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 260A5Addition to Income4Section 143(2)3

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S BOULEVARD SERVICE PVT LTD

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue fails on the ground

ITAT/70/2021HC Calcutta14 Feb 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : February 14, 2022. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. S.N. Dutta, Adv. … For The Appellant Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. … For The Respondent The Court : We Have Heard Mr. S.N. Dutta, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant/Revenue & Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Duly Assisted By Ms. Swapna Das, Learned Counsel For The Respondent/Assessee. There Is A Delay Of 816 Days In Filing The Appeal. The Respondent Has Filed Affidavit-In-Opposition Vehemently Opposing The Delay. On

Section 260A

condone the delay in filing the appeal. Hence, the petition is allowed. ITAT 70 of 2021 This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for brevity) is directed against the order dated 24th August, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench ‘C’, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No. 1741/Kol/2016, 1577/Kol/2017

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT CO. LTD.

In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of law

ITAT/174/2021HC Calcutta12 Sept 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : 12Th September, 2022 Appearance : Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. ….For Appellant Mr. Abhijit Chatterjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Ram Sharma, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act, For Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 22Nd July, 2020, Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, `D Virtual Court’, Kolkata (Tribunal) In Ita No. 1486/Kol/2019, For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :- A. Whether The Learned Tribunal Has Committed Substantial Error In Law In Confirming The Decision Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) In Allowing Long Term Capital Loss Of Rs. 1,09,80,30,873/- On Transfer Of Government Securities After Applying Cost Inflation Index On Sale Of Government Securities & Holding He Government Securities Are Not Bond & Debentures For The Purpose Of 3Rd Proviso To Section 48 Of The Act (4Th Proviso After Amendment) Which Is Petently Wrong & Latently Irregular ?

Section 14ASection 260ASection 37(1)Section 40Section 48Section 50

46A of I.T. Rules 1962 ? F. Whether the Learned Tribunal has committed substantial error in law in confirming the decision of Learned CIT(A) for allowing the Education Cess as expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which is not in accordance with law and as such present because it is a part of Income

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. THE RIFLE FACTORY CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed

ITAT/87/2025HC Calcutta05 May 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 5Th May, 2025.

Section 260ASection 46A

delay has been properly explained the same is condoned. The application is allowed. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 21.06.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA/813/Kol/2023 for the assessment year 2017-18. The revenue

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2, KOLKATA vs. M/S EVERSAFE SECURITIES PVT LTD

ITAT/156/2022HC Calcutta02 Jan 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 2Nd January, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Avratosh Mazumder, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. ..For Respondent

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260A

Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 30th April, 2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench in ITA/604/KOL/2020 for the assessment year 2012-13. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions