BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 251(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai145Mumbai122Karnataka102Delhi88Ahmedabad77Pune73Kolkata71Raipur61Bangalore58Hyderabad49Jaipur46Lucknow23Nagpur22Surat20Indore20Patna17Panaji16Chandigarh16Rajkot9Jodhpur5Amritsar5Cochin4Visakhapatnam3Cuttack3Guwahati3Jabalpur3Calcutta2Allahabad2Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1SC1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 343Section 36(1)3Section 36(2)2Section 197(17)2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PREMIER TIE UP PVT LTD

ITAT/81/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

For Respondent: Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Adv
Section 34Section 36(1)Section 36(2)

condoned and waived on the ground of his acquiescence in the holding of further proceedings.” 73. In the backdrop of the above, this Court notices that having once made a disclosure in the first sitting that the Arbitrator and his family members were connected with and represented the Bhaiya group in CS 344 of 2015, the Learned Arbitrator was obliged

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S Y R TRADERS PVT LTD

ITAT/198/2023HC Calcutta17 Nov 2023

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Bench:
Section 197Section 197(17)Section 264

251 ITR 791. In the facts of the case mentioned above, it is submitted that the orders passed under Section 264 of the said Act for the assessments year 2016-17 and 2017-18 refusing to condone the delay cannot be sustained and the same should be set aside. 11. In so far as the rejection order passed in respect