BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai381Delhi310Mumbai303Bangalore236Pune142Karnataka130Nagpur129Kolkata126Jaipur104Ahmedabad102Raipur58Cochin51Hyderabad45Indore36Surat31Chandigarh29Visakhapatnam19Kerala19Rajkot14Varanasi12Cuttack12Lucknow12Jodhpur10Patna8Dehradun7SC6Agra5Amritsar5Panaji4Calcutta4Guwahati3Jabalpur3Andhra Pradesh2Rajasthan1Telangana1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 343Section 36(1)3Section 260A3Section 11(2)3Section 36(2)2Section 119(2)(b)2Exemption2Condonation of Delay2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS KOLKATA vs. M/S INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/270/2023HC Calcutta10 Jan 2024

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : 10Th January, 2024. Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ..For Appellant The Court: We Have Heard Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel For Appellant Revenue. The Respondent Has Been Served & An Affidavit Of Service Has Been Filed But None Appears For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 44 Days In Filing The Appeal & We Have Perused The Condone Delay Petition & We Find Sufficient Causes Were Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Hence, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned. This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 25.5.2023 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Ita/480/Kol/2022 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 260A

Section 119(2)(b) by which the powers delegated to the Principal Chief 3 Commissioner of Income Tax/Commissioner of Income Tax to condone the delay in filing Form 10B beyond 365 days up to 3 years from the assessment year 2018-19 or for subsequent year. Applying the said circular the learned Tribunal affirmed the order passed

COMM OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA vs. ST JOHN DIOCESAN GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL

In the result, the connected application for stay IA

ITAT/408/2017HC Calcutta12 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 11(2)Section 143(3)Section 260A

condonation of delay (IA No.GA/1/2017 (old No.GA/3784/2017) is allowed. 2 Re: ITAT/408/2017: This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ in brevity) is directed against the order dated 2nd June, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata (the ‘Tribunal’ in short) ITA No.1079/Kol/2013

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,KOLKATA - 2 vs. M/S MADHU JAYANTI INTERNATIONAL LTD.

The appeal stands disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to

ITAT/337/2017HC Calcutta23 Nov 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date: November 23, 2021. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Ms. Sucharita Biswas, Adv. … For The Appellant Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. … For The Respondent/Assessee Re: Ia No:Ga/1/2017 (Old No. Ga/3330/2017) In Itat/337/2017 The Court : This Application Has Been Filed To Condone The Delay In Preferring The Appeal.

Section 10BSection 260A

201 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition. We are satisfied with the reasons and the cause shown. Accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the petition stands allowed. RE: IA NO:GA/2/2017 (OLD NO. GA/3331/2017) in ITAT/337/2017 This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PREMIER TIE UP PVT LTD

ITAT/81/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

For Respondent: Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Adv
Section 34Section 36(1)Section 36(2)

condoned and waived on the ground of his acquiescence in the holding of further proceedings.” 73. In the backdrop of the above, this Court notices that having once made a disclosure in the first sitting that the Arbitrator and his family members were connected with and represented the Bhaiya group in CS 344 of 2015, the Learned Arbitrator was obliged