BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 153Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai444Delhi427Mumbai253Hyderabad158Kolkata138Bangalore129Jaipur96Amritsar74Ahmedabad72Pune55Surat51Chandigarh37Nagpur30Rajkot26Patna25Visakhapatnam22Indore17Cuttack16Guwahati16Raipur14Karnataka11Lucknow10Dehradun9Ranchi9Jodhpur8Calcutta8Panaji7Cochin7Telangana5SC4Jabalpur2Orissa2Punjab & Haryana1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 26315Section 153A13Section 260A9Section 143(3)9Section 685Addition to Income5Condonation of Delay5Section 54F4Limitation/Time-bar

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. SEVEN STAR STEELS LTD

Appeal stands dismissed and the

ITAT/43/2025HC Calcutta05 May 2025

Bench: :

Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143ASection 153ASection 245B(4)Section 260A

153A(1). 7 “The counsel appearing for the Department relied on sections 139(5) and 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act read with Circular No. 9 of 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes to contend that the appellant ought to have made an application for condonation of delay

4
Long Term Capital Gains3
Section 1322
Section 132A2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S TECHNO TRACOM PVT LTD

ITAT/67/2023HC Calcutta27 Mar 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 27Th March, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...For The Appellant Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Mr. Anil Dugar, Adv. ...For The Respondent. The Court : There Is A Delay Of 168 Days In Filing The Appeal. We Have Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Counsel For The Appellant & Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent & Perused The Averments Set Out In The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Application For Condonation. We Find Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation.

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154ASection 260ASection 263Section 68

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 18th April, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No.205/Kol/2021 for the assessment year 2009-10. The revenue has raised

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1,KOLKATA vs. M/S PHALGUNI ENCLAVE PVT LTD

The appeal stands disposed of in

ITAT/281/2022HC Calcutta08 May 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 8Th May, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...For Appellant Mr. S. Kejriwal, Adv. Mr. N. Mittal, Adv. …For Respondent The Court :- It Appears That There Is A Delay Of Twenty Days In Filing This Appeal. We Have Perused The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Delay Condone Petition & We Find That Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Hence, The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned. The Petition For Condonation Of Delay Is Allowed. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 16.06.2022 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench Kolkata (The Tribunal) In It(Ss) A No. 24/Kol/2021 & Co 05/Kol/2022 Relating To Assessment Year 2011-12.

Section 132Section 132ASection 153Section 153ASection 2(22)Section 2(22)(e)Section 260A

condonation of delay is allowed. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (the Act) is directed against the order dated 16.06.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench Kolkata (the Tribunal) in IT(SS) A No. 24/Kol/2021 and CO 05/Kol/2022 relating to assessment year 2011-12. 2 The revenue

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. SRI RAHUL SARAF

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect

ITAT/218/2024HC Calcutta20 Sept 2024

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : September 20, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Soumitra Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. Mr. Pranabesh Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Ms. Elina Dey, Adv. Mr. Sourendra Nath Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 54F

condonation of delay is allowed. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the order dated 9th August, 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench Kolkata in ITA (S.S.) A. No.:117/Kol/2022 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2 The revenue has raised the following

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S SALARPURIA PROPERTIES PVT LTD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of law are

ITAT/167/2023HC Calcutta30 Aug 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 30Th August, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …For Apellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akhilesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Indranil Banerjee, Adv. ….For Respondent

Section 148(3)Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 260ASection 263Section 80I

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 3rd August, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata in ITA/130/Kol/2021 for the assessment year 2010-11. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9,KOLKATA vs. MANJU OSATWAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/96/2021HC Calcutta11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Swapna Das, Adv
Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 180Section 182Section 260ASection 263

condonation of delay stands disposed of. ITAT No. 96 of 2021 4. This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (the Act for brevity) is directed against the order dated 15th January, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No. 707/Kol/2019 for the assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. SHRI SAWANKUMAR T JAJOO

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

ITAT/271/2024HC Calcutta17 Jan 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

condone the delay in filing of the appeal. 4. The assessee preferred an appeal challenging the orders under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1, KOLKATA vs. M/S BASIL INTERNATINAL LTD

The appeal stands disposed of on the low tax effect and the

ITAT/13/2018HC Calcutta05 Sept 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : September 5, 2022. Appearance: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. … For Appellant Ga/1/2018(Ga/200/2018) The Court : We Have Heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant. There Is A Delay Of 523 Days In Filing This Appeal. Though Notice Has Not Been Served On The Respondent Assessee, The Learned Standing Counsel Has Reported That The Case Will Not Be Pursued By The Department On Account Of The Low Tax Effect, We Exercise Discretion & Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed.

Section 153ASection 260ASection 27(1)(c)

condone the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the application is allowed. ITAT/13/2018 This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for brevity) is directed against the common order dated 24th Februar7y, 2016 2 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal