BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata196Mumbai192Delhi120Chennai94Ahmedabad84Bangalore81Pune70Hyderabad53Jaipur41Cuttack28Indore24Lucknow23Cochin19Chandigarh18Surat16Visakhapatnam15Rajkot13Jabalpur11Nagpur11Jodhpur8Patna7Calcutta6Agra6Amritsar5Panaji5Varanasi4Guwahati4Dehradun3Raipur3Allahabad2Ranchi1Karnataka1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 260A6Section 10B6Condonation of Delay4Section 1473Section 143(3)3Exemption3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 119(2)(b)2Deduction

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS KOLKATA vs. M/S INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/270/2023HC Calcutta10 Jan 2024

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : 10Th January, 2024. Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ..For Appellant The Court: We Have Heard Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel For Appellant Revenue. The Respondent Has Been Served & An Affidavit Of Service Has Been Filed But None Appears For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 44 Days In Filing The Appeal & We Have Perused The Condone Delay Petition & We Find Sufficient Causes Were Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Hence, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned. This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 25.5.2023 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Ita/480/Kol/2022 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 260A

Section 119(2)(b) of the said Act dated 17.08.2020 by the CIT (Exemptions) Kolkata wherein the condonation of delay in filing of Form 10B

2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS KOLKATA vs. INDIAN EX SERVICES LEAGUE WEST BENGAL

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

ITAT/213/2023HC Calcutta29 Sept 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 29Th September, 2023 Appearance : Mr.Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Prabir Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Asok Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Bharat Ch. Simai, Adv. …For Respondent.

Section 260A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 24.11.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata “A” Bench (the Tribunal) in ITA No. 398/Kol/2021 for the assessment year 2018-19. The revenue has raised the following substantial

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOL-1, KOLKATA vs. CHEVIOT COMPANY LIMITED

ITAT/420/2016HC Calcutta11 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260A

condone the delay of 68 days in filing the appeal. Accordingly, IA No.GA/1/2016 (Old No.GA/3451/2016) is allowed. ITAT/420/2016: This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 20th January, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, “A” Bench, Kolkata

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,KOLKATA - 2 vs. M/S MADHU JAYANTI INTERNATIONAL LTD.

The appeal stands disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to

ITAT/337/2017HC Calcutta23 Nov 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date: November 23, 2021. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Ms. Sucharita Biswas, Adv. … For The Appellant Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. … For The Respondent/Assessee Re: Ia No:Ga/1/2017 (Old No. Ga/3330/2017) In Itat/337/2017 The Court : This Application Has Been Filed To Condone The Delay In Preferring The Appeal.

Section 10BSection 260A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the petition stands allowed. RE: IA NO:GA/2/2017 (OLD NO. GA/3331/2017) in ITAT/337/2017 This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, in brevity) is directed against the order dated 03.08.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata “C” Bench, Kolkata

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HIMADRI SPECIALITY CHEMICALS LTD

ITAT/170/2022HC Calcutta31 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 10BSection 115JSection 260ASection 263

condonation of delay (IA No.GA/1/2022) is allowed. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 3rd January, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No.1351/Kol/2019 for the assessment year 2012-13. The revenue

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. M/S JJ EXPORTS PVT. LTD

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground that the company has been wound up and

ITAT/54/2018HC Calcutta05 Sept 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : September 5, 2022. Appearance: Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. … For Appellant Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhertha Das, Adv. …For Respondent Ga/1/2018(Ga/554/2018) The Court : We Have Heard Ms. Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant & Ms. Swapna Das & Mr. Siddhertha Das, Learned Advocates For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 127 Days In Filing This Appeal. We Have Perused The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Application & We Find Sufficient Cause Has Not Been Shown To Prefer The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned.

Section 260ASection 92C

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 2 ITAT/54/2018 This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for brevity) is directed against the order dated 12th May, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench Kolkata in I.T.A. No. 201/Kol./2012 for the assessment years 2007-08. The revenue