BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 02clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai427Chennai381Kolkata379Delhi274Pune259Ahmedabad208Bangalore189Hyderabad174Jaipur151Visakhapatnam80Lucknow78Surat67Chandigarh63Amritsar60Indore52Cuttack44Raipur41Rajkot34Panaji33Nagpur25Patna24Cochin17Allahabad16Guwahati16Agra9Telangana8Jodhpur6SC6Varanasi5Jabalpur4Karnataka4Calcutta3Orissa2Dehradun2Ranchi2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 343Section 36(1)3Section 36(2)2Section 260A2Section 119(2)(b)2Condonation of Delay2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS KOLKATA vs. M/S INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/270/2023HC Calcutta10 Jan 2024

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : 10Th January, 2024. Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ..For Appellant The Court: We Have Heard Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel For Appellant Revenue. The Respondent Has Been Served & An Affidavit Of Service Has Been Filed But None Appears For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 44 Days In Filing The Appeal & We Have Perused The Condone Delay Petition & We Find Sufficient Causes Were Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Hence, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned. This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 25.5.2023 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Ita/480/Kol/2022 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 260A

Section 119(2)(b) of the said Act dated 17.08.2020 by the CIT (Exemptions) Kolkata wherein the condonation of delay in filing of Form 10B was rejected? c) Whether in the facts and in the circumstances of the Tribunal was justified in law in not appreciating the fact that CBDT had issued Circular No. 02

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA vs. VIVEK MUNDRA

In the result, the connected application for stay IA

ITAT/59/2018HC Calcutta12 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260A

condonation of delay (IA No.GA/1/2018 (old No.GA/593/2018) is allowed. 2 Re: ITAT/59/2018: This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ in brevity) is directed against the order dated 2nd June, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata (the ‘Tribunal’ in short) ITA No.2171/Kol/2014

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. PREMIER TIE UP PVT LTD

ITAT/81/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

For Respondent: Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Adv
Section 34Section 36(1)Section 36(2)

02,037/- together with simple interest thereon @ 12% per annum calculated from 1st January, 2012 up to the date of payment. Claim No.-3 :There will be an Award in favour of the Claimant company against Gopaldas Bagri, Indra Kumar Bagri, Sarla Bagri, Anil Bagri and Abhishek Kothari for a sum of Rs.17.5 crores together with simple interest thereon