BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi430Chennai376Mumbai245Hyderabad223Kolkata205Karnataka109Jaipur101Bangalore87Ahmedabad75Surat70Pune48Amritsar45Chandigarh39Rajkot33Visakhapatnam28Patna27Nagpur27Guwahati19Indore16Cuttack16Lucknow15Cochin14Dehradun13Raipur13Jodhpur10Telangana7SC6Calcutta6Panaji4Kerala4Orissa3Ranchi3Jabalpur2Agra2Gauhati1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 26312Section 260A7Section 143(3)7Section 54F4Section 153A4Addition to Income4Search & Seizure4Long Term Capital Gains3Condonation of Delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S TECHNO TRACOM PVT LTD

ITAT/67/2023HC Calcutta27 Mar 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 27Th March, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...For The Appellant Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Mr. Anil Dugar, Adv. ...For The Respondent. The Court : There Is A Delay Of 168 Days In Filing The Appeal. We Have Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Counsel For The Appellant & Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent & Perused The Averments Set Out In The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Application For Condonation. We Find Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation.

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154ASection 260ASection 263Section 68

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 18th April, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No.205/Kol/2021 for the assessment year 2009-10. The revenue has raised

3
Section 682
Exemption2
Limitation/Time-bar2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. SRI RAHUL SARAF

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect

ITAT/218/2024HC Calcutta20 Sept 2024

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : September 20, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Soumitra Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. Mr. Pranabesh Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Ms. Elina Dey, Adv. Mr. Sourendra Nath Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 54F

condonation of delay is allowed. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the order dated 9th August, 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench Kolkata in ITA (S.S.) A. No.:117/Kol/2022 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2 The revenue has raised the following

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9,KOLKATA vs. MANJU OSATWAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/96/2021HC Calcutta11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Swapna Das, Adv
Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 180Section 182Section 260ASection 263

condonation of delay stands disposed of. ITAT No. 96 of 2021 4. This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (the Act for brevity) is directed against the order dated 15th January, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No. 707/Kol/2019 for the assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1, KOLKATA vs. M/S BASIL INTERNATINAL LTD

The appeal stands disposed of on the low tax effect and the

ITAT/13/2018HC Calcutta05 Sept 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : September 5, 2022. Appearance: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. … For Appellant Ga/1/2018(Ga/200/2018) The Court : We Have Heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant. There Is A Delay Of 523 Days In Filing This Appeal. Though Notice Has Not Been Served On The Respondent Assessee, The Learned Standing Counsel Has Reported That The Case Will Not Be Pursued By The Department On Account Of The Low Tax Effect, We Exercise Discretion & Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed.

Section 153ASection 260ASection 27(1)(c)

condone the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the application is allowed. ITAT/13/2018 This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for brevity) is directed against the common order dated 24th Februar7y, 2016 2 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S BOSCON LEATHER PRODUCTS PVT LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITAT/69/2025HC Calcutta23 Apr 2025

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Dated : 23Rd April, 2025

Section 260A

condone the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the application GA 1/2025 is allowed. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 7th November, 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No.822/Kol/2023 for the assessment year

MANISH BAID vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 22(4) KOLKATA AND ORS

ITAT/239/2023HC Calcutta13 Dec 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 13Th December, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, Adv. …For Appellant Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv ….For Respondent The Court : - We Have Heard Learned Counsel On Either Side. There Is A Delay Of 163 Days In Filing The Appeal. We Are Satisfied With The Explanation Offered By The Petitioner & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned & The Application Ga/1/2023 Is Allowed. The Assessee Has Preferred This Appeal Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Ac 1961 Challenging The Order Dated 10.11.2022 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Itat No. 530/Kol/2018 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 & The Order Dated 35 Of 2023 In Ma 7/Kol/2023. The Assessee Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration:

Section 260A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the application GA/1/2023 is allowed. The assessee has preferred this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Ac 1961 challenging the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITAT No. 530/Kol/2018 for the assessment year 2014-15 and the order dated