BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai300Kolkata201Mumbai168Delhi124Karnataka100Bangalore98Hyderabad87Pune76Jaipur62Indore58Chandigarh54Ahmedabad38Panaji36Rajkot29Cuttack27Surat21Cochin20Raipur16Nagpur14Amritsar14Patna11Lucknow10Visakhapatnam10Agra5Jodhpur4Jabalpur4Calcutta2Himachal Pradesh2Dehradun2Varanasi2SC1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 26322Section 260A2Section 682Section 143(3)2Section 153A2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar2Revision u/s 2632

OLYMPUS SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD. & ANR vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA 2 & ANR

The appeal is allowed and the stay

ITAT/328/2017HC Calcutta04 May 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 147Section 260ASection 263Section 263(1)Section 68

revision for the purpose of directing the A.O. to hold another investigation when the order of the A.O. was neigher erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 5. For that the Ld. CIT was not justified in holding that creditworthiness and identity of the shareholders from whom share capital money was received and genuineness of the transaction

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S TECHNO TRACOM PVT LTD

ITAT/67/2023
HC Calcutta
27 Mar 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 27Th March, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...For The Appellant Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Mr. Anil Dugar, Adv. ...For The Respondent. The Court : There Is A Delay Of 168 Days In Filing The Appeal. We Have Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Counsel For The Appellant & Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent & Perused The Averments Set Out In The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Application For Condonation. We Find Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation.

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154ASection 260ASection 263Section 68

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 18th April, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No.205/Kol/2021 for the assessment year 2009-10. The revenue has raised