BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

258 results for “condonation of delay”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai6,162Mumbai5,355Delhi4,820Kolkata3,420Pune2,601Bangalore2,305Ahmedabad1,653Hyderabad1,619Jaipur1,071Patna1,049Cochin772Chandigarh764Nagpur704Cuttack700Surat681Indore622Visakhapatnam504Amritsar478Lucknow462Raipur451Karnataka391Rajkot388Agra340Calcutta258Panaji253Dehradun156Guwahati143Jodhpur119Jabalpur102Ranchi96SC79Telangana77Allahabad68Varanasi44Kerala32Andhra Pradesh21Orissa14Punjab & Haryana12Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Uttarakhand1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 260A82Condonation of Delay46Addition to Income37Limitation/Time-bar35Section 26333Section 6824Section 143(3)20Disallowance17Deduction

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL 1, KOLKATA vs. BINANI INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITAT/65/2018HC Calcutta23 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

condone delay application giving certain reasons for condonation of delay. In the preceding paragraph while noting

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S Y R TRADERS PVT LTD

ITAT/198/2023HC Calcutta17 Nov 2023

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 197Section 197(17)Section 264

condoned 17 the delay. In my view, since the delay was not condoned the observation made

Showing 1–20 of 258 · Page 1 of 13

...
14
Section 14A13
Section 80I13
Section 10(38)11

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. SHRI MANOJ KUMAR DHUPELIA

ITAT/188/2022HC Calcutta04 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ

delay condonation application. As per the aforesaid delay condonation application, the impugned order is dated 15.06.2020 which

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 KOLKATA vs. ASISH KUMAR GHOSH

ITA/2/2021HC Calcutta01 Apr 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 1St April, 2022 Appearance :-

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 68

condoning the delay. This is as a result of deeming fiction which is created by condoning the delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. ASISH KUMAR GHOSH

ITAT/73/2021HC Calcutta01 Apr 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 1St April, 2022 Appearance :-

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 68

condoning the delay. This is as a result of deeming fiction which is created by condoning the delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. EVENT DEVELOPERS PVT LTD

ITAT/58/2025HC Calcutta19 May 2025

Bench: The Hon’Ble High Court Circuit Bench At Port Blair On 09-01-2025 & Thereafter The File Was Processed For Approval From The Department For Preferring The Appeal.

Section 5

condonation of delay in filing the appeal being CAN/1/2025 is dismissed. Since the application for condoning the delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S VISHNU DISTRIBUTORS PVT LIMITED

ITAT/56/2025HC Calcutta05 May 2025

Bench: The Hon’Ble High Court Circuit Bench At Port Blair On 09-01-2025 & Thereafter The File Was Processed For Approval From The Department For Preferring The Appeal.

Section 5

condonation of delay in filing the appeal being CAN/1/2025 is dismissed. Since the application for condoning the delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INDIAN ROADWAYS CORPORATION LTD.

ITAT/62/2020HC Calcutta08 Feb 2021

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

For Respondent: Mr. Atarup Banerjee
Section 5

condonation of delay of 184 days in preferring the said appeal. In 4 support of the said application

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL -1 ,KOLKATA vs. RATAN KUMAR SOMANI

ITAT/171/2018HC Calcutta14 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260A

condone delay petition, the Memorandum of Appeal, Stay Petition and condone delay petition was ready on 31.10.2017 and received

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS KOLKATA vs. M/S INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION

The appeal is dismissed

ITAT/270/2023HC Calcutta10 Jan 2024

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Date : 10Th January, 2024. Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ..For Appellant The Court: We Have Heard Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel For Appellant Revenue. The Respondent Has Been Served & An Affidavit Of Service Has Been Filed But None Appears For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 44 Days In Filing The Appeal & We Have Perused The Condone Delay Petition & We Find Sufficient Causes Were Shown For Not Preferring The Appeal Within The Period Of Limitation. Hence, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned. This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 25.5.2023 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Ita/480/Kol/2022 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 260A

delay of 44 days in filing the appeal and we have perused the condone delay petition and we find

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. BEEKAY STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/177/2021HC Calcutta25 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260ASection 263Section 43B

condone the delay. Accordingly the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The petition for condonation

M/S SHEO SHAKTI COKE INDUSTRIES vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 37, KOLKATA

ITAT/2/2022HC Calcutta08 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 5

condonation of delay under the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 1963 Act) for condoning

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S ORCHID GRIHA NIRMAN PVT LTD

ITAT/108/2021HC Calcutta31 Jan 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Dated January 31, 2022. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, Adv. Mr. Asok Bhowmick, Adv. … For The Appellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. ..For The Respondent The Court :- We Have Heard Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, Learned Standing Counsel For The Appellant/Revenue Duly Assisted By Mr. Asok

Section 10Section 147Section 263ASection 45(3)

condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. The petition for condonation of delay

M/S. V2 RETAIL LIMITED vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), UNDER CIT-IV,KOL

ITAT/185/2018HC Calcutta04 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260ASection 32(1)(iia)

condonation of delay. Accordingly the delay is condoned. The application for condonation of delay

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XII, KOLKATA vs. MANOJ MURARKA

ITA/181/2011HC Calcutta24 Nov 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260A

condonation of delay. The delay in preferring the appeal is 2428 days. The explanation given in the petition

Principal Commissioner Income Tax Central 2 Kolkata vs. Alert Consultants and Credit Private Limited

ITAT/191/2025HC Calcutta19 Jan 2026

Bench: This Court, As Outlined In Circular No. 9/2024 Dated 17Th September 2024.

Section 251

condoning the delay, when the Revenue has explained that there was “sufficient cause” for such delay before

AKHILESH SINGH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 13/4 KOLKATA

ITAT/180/2025HC Calcutta28 Oct 2025

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Section 260A

condonation of delay, leniently. At the same time, the appellate authority is not required to render the condonation

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL , KOLKATA 2 vs. M/S HOOGLY MILLS CO LTD

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax

ITAT/10/2018HC Calcutta14 Feb 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

Section 14ASection 260A

condone delay 2 application and, therefore, we are exercising discretion to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT AND TP) KOLKATA vs. M/S DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION

ITAT/71/2021HC Calcutta09 Dec 2021

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 9Th December, 2021 Appearance :- Mr. Asok Bhowmick, Adv., Led By Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv. … For Appellant Mr. Nageswar Rao, Adv. Mr. Avra Majumder, Adv. Sk. Md. Bilwal Hossain, Adv. … For Respondent

delay in filing the appeal is inordinate, unexplained and therefore, cannot be condoned. Thus, the application for condonation

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. SEVEN STAR STEELS LTD

Appeal stands dismissed and the

ITAT/43/2025HC Calcutta05 May 2025

Bench: :

Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143ASection 153ASection 245B(4)Section 260A

delay is condoned. The application for condonation of delay being IA No: GA/1/2025 is allowed. This