BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai726Delhi333Jaipur199Bangalore89Kolkata83Pune60Chandigarh57Chennai55Indore44Surat39Ahmedabad38Hyderabad21Guwahati17Nagpur13Lucknow9Amritsar8Jodhpur7Rajkot5Cochin5Visakhapatnam4Raipur4Ranchi3Agra3Calcutta3SC2Karnataka1Kerala1Patna1Dehradun1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 10(38)7Section 685Section 143(3)4Section 260A3Section 69C3Long Term Capital Gains3Penny Stock3Addition to Income3Section 1472Disallowance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. AMIT KUMAR JAIN

ITAT/113/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: :

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 68Section 69C

Capital Gain (herein after referred as LTCG) amounting to Rs.39,49,493/- which effectively negated the addition of Rs.39,76,500/- as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and deleted the addition of Rs.1,19,295/- as commission paid outside the books of 3 account under Section 69C

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. NIKUNJ DHANUKA

Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed

2
Exemption2
ITAT/104/2025
HC Calcutta
18 Jun 2025

Bench: :

Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260ASection 68Section 69C

Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 made by the Assessing 2 Officer by ignoring the larger scam of tax evasion by way of bogus capital gain

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. M/S B L TAK AND SONS HUF

The appeal is allowed and the order passed by the learned Tribunal is set aside and the

ITAT/243/2024HC Calcutta09 Jun 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 9Th June, 2025.

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 69C

Gain from sale of penny stocks and also covered by exceptions laid in respect of para 3.1(h) of CBDT’s Circular no.5 of 2024 dated March 15, 2024? We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudheria, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant/department. Despite service of notice on the respondent/assessee through post as well as through e-mail, none appears