BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 153Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai914Delhi794Bangalore291Jaipur240Chennai230Hyderabad217Ahmedabad116Cochin75Nagpur62Pune53Chandigarh49Ranchi33Guwahati31Kolkata30Indore27Visakhapatnam23Lucknow19Dehradun16Jodhpur16Rajkot15Raipur11Surat10Karnataka9Cuttack8Amritsar8Allahabad7Kerala5Patna5Jabalpur3Calcutta3Telangana2Agra2Rajasthan1SC1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7Section 260A4Section 684Section 54F4Section 153A3Long Term Capital Gains3Addition to Income3Section 10(38)2Condonation of Delay2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. SHRI SAWANKUMAR T JAJOO

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

ITAT/271/2024HC Calcutta17 Jan 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

Capital Gains thereby giving rise to the vice of perversity in the decision making process? iii) Whether the Hon’ble ITAT had erred in law and on facts by deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer u/s. 68 of the IT Act, 1961 in the order u/s. 143(3) read with section 153A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. SRI RAHUL SARAF

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect

ITAT/218/2024HC Calcutta20 Sept 2024

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : September 20, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Soumitra Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. Mr. Pranabesh Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Ms. Elina Dey, Adv. Mr. Sourendra Nath Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 54F

capital gain from sale of equity shares of Forum IT Park and the investment was made in land therefore the assessee was not eligible to claim deduction under Section 54F which came to light in the Course of assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9,KOLKATA vs. MANJU OSATWAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/96/2021HC Calcutta11 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Swapna Das, Adv
Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 180Section 182Section 260ASection 263

capital gain of Rs.74,24,380/- to tax under the IDS and paid the taxes thereon and this fact was brought to the notice of the PCIT in pursuance of the show cause notice issued under Section 263 of the Act and the Department’s representative appearing on behalf of the Department before the Tribunal also acknowledged the same