M/S. GAYAN TRADERS LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-II

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Section 10 of the Act by Finance No. 2 Act, 2004 with effect from 01.04.2005. Further the tribunal failed to consider that the short term capital gains from shares held as investment could not be assessed as business income merely because the period of holding of the shares in such cases was somewhat short as compared to other investments. Thus

M/S. INDI STOCK PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA- II

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Section 143(3) of the Act dated December 31, 2007. The CIT(A) pointed out that the assessee had maintained separate accounts for trading in shares and in this account, shares were bought and sold at frequent interval and even on daily settlement basis. The shares by way of investment were held for period varying from one day to more

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX -4, KOLKATA vs. M/S LINDE INDIA LIMITED

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

13 8. The learned Tribunal by an order dated February 17, 2016 allowed the appeal of the assessee in part and dismissed the appeal of the revenue. The learned Tribunal was pleased to hold that no disallowance could be made under Sections 40(a)(i)/ 40(a)(ia) of the Act. On the issue of capital gains

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. RUSSEL CREDIT LIMITED

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

8. The Principal Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 falters on the ground that the assessment order lacks "elaborate discussion." It is a settled jurisprudence, as held in CIT v. Max India Ltd. reported in (2007) 295 ITR 282 (SC) that clarifies brevity in reasoning does not equate to non-inquiry or error. Where the AO has made relevant enquiries

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9, KOLKATA vs. PUSPA DEVI TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. AAYUSH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. POOJA JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. SURAJ SAHANA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA vs. SMT. BABITA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAKESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-SILIGURI vs. SHEKHAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA KUMAR PARSURAMKA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. GITESH TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MUKESH SARAOGI (HUF)

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA vs. MUKTA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18, KOLKATA vs. SRI VIKASH GOEL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,BURDWAN vs. BIJAYA TAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. PRAKASHO DEVI SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 142 (1) of the Act. The assessee is stated to have produced the copy of the income tax returns, profit and loss account, ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 13 of 150 balance sheet, computation of total income, statement of STCG/LTCG, D- Mat account, contract notes, bank statements and other details. The assessing officer after scrutiny