PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5,KOL vs. SUNITA GOYAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SILIGURI vs. NITIN KUMAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. AAYUSH JHUNJHUNWALA HUF

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KOL 5 vs. RANJIKA GUPTA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SILIGURI vs. NEETU AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NAND KISHORE AGARWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOPAL PRASAD TIKMANI HUF

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5,KOL vs. RAMAKANT BERIWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. M/S GIRISH TIKMANI HUF

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PR CIT 9 KOLKATA vs. GIRISH TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. GOPAL PRASAD TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

disallowing the claim of the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), the assessees have filed appeals before the Tribunal which have

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. RUSSEL CREDIT LIMITED

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

capital gain, set off against brought-forward losses from AY 2012-13, alongside allowing a Rs.96,65,106/- losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment. 3. The Principal CIT invoked Section 263 on February 27, 2023, holding the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests due to the shares' classification as stock-in-trade, excess set-off and disallowable

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. RAJESH KUMAR DAMANI

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

disallowance of the claim of Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) treating the same as fraudulent, overlooking the fact that the entire

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. AMIT KUMAR JAIN

Bench: :

Capital Gain in the case of the assessee for the Assessment year 2014-15 when such claim was fraudulent and not to be allowed? iv) Whether the Learned Tribunal has committed substantial error in law in deleting the addition under section 68 of the Act, 1961 amounting to Rs.39,76,500/- on account of disallowance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. NAND KISHORE AGARWALA

The appeal is allowed and the substantial questions of law are

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

disallowances of Long Term Capital Gain of Rs.12,47,758/- overlooking that the entire transactions were stage managed with the object

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. SHRI SAWANKUMAR T JAJOO

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Capital Gain of Rs.4,33,71,468/- claimed as exempted u/s. 10(38) of the IT Act, 1961 by the assessee from sale of scrips of Wagend Infra Venture Pvt. Limited was correctly disallowed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. SMT SUMAN KOTHARI

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 3Rd January, 2023. Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mita, Adv. ..For Appellant Mr. Pranit Bag , Adv. Mr. A. K. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Debdatta Saha, Adv. …For Respondent Re: Ga/1/2022 The Court:- Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Advocate For The Appellant & Mr. Pranit Bag, Learned Advocate For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 1126 Days In Filing The Appeal. Though The Reasons Given In The Affidavit Are Not Convincing The Issues Involved In The Appeal Had Been Decided By This Court In Earlier Matters, This Court Exercises Discretion & Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed.

Capital gain of Rs.1,12,13,010/- and claim the same as exempted from income tax u/s 10(38) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, giving rise thereby to the vice of perversity in the process of decision making ? 2. Whether the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in deleting the disallowances

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. SRI RAHUL SARAF

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : September 20, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Soumitra Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. Mr. Pranabesh Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Ms. Elina Dey, Adv. Mr. Sourendra Nath Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent

Capital Gain and disallowance of claim and deduction under Section 54F considering the facts of the case of the assessee