BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 40A(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai313Delhi284Chennai89Kolkata84Bangalore57Ahmedabad45Hyderabad41Jaipur38Amritsar37Indore25Rajkot22Allahabad17Chandigarh16Nagpur14Pune14Surat11Jodhpur11Visakhapatnam9Guwahati9Raipur8Lucknow6Agra5Cuttack5Calcutta3Cochin1Ranchi1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 260A3Section 133(6)2Section 14A2Deduction2Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA - 4 vs. M/S STANDARD LEATHER PVT LTD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of

ITAT/133/2017HC Calcutta07 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE

For Appellant: Mr. Debasish Choudhury, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Sukalpa Seal, Adv
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 40A(3)

2 (a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ Bench was correct in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction in respect of raw hide purchases made in cash exceeding Rs.20,000/- u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? (b) Whether on the facts

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S ITC LTD

ITAT/89/2025HC Calcutta21 Jul 2025

Bench: The Learned Tribunal – One By The Assessee & The Other By The Revenue Which Have Been Disposed Of By A Common Order, Impugned In This Appeal. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

For Appellant: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate
Section 14ASection 260ASection 37(1)Section 40a

40a(ii) nor allowable as business expenditure under any provision of the Act, including Section 37(1) of the Act being the personal liability of the assessee? 4 (h) Whether the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in admitting fresh claim of ESOP raised by the assessee which was not made in the return of income

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-14, KOLKATA vs. PKS HOLDINGS

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the question nos

ITAT/62/2017HC Calcutta03 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

B” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No. 1677/Kol/2011 for the assessment year 2007-08. The revenue has framed the following substantial question of law for consideration :- i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the additions