37 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 37clear
Sorted by relevance
Showing 1–20 of 37 · Page 1 of 2
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the question nos
Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam
purchase were the same settlement number. Therefore, the Assessing Officer came to the conclusion that the loss should be treated as a speculative loss under Section 43(5) of the Act and accordingly, disallowed the same. Further, the Assessing Officer observed that the transactions made through the stock broker had been held to be sham transactions when the Assessing Officer