BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

50 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 10(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,775Delhi2,503Kolkata841Jaipur644Ahmedabad574Chennai527Surat415Pune392Bangalore360Chandigarh271Hyderabad227Indore202Raipur157Karnataka126Rajkot121Amritsar110Nagpur107Lucknow75Visakhapatnam72Guwahati67Cuttack66Cochin65Calcutta50Agra45Jodhpur41Allahabad34Patna29Ranchi24Telangana18Dehradun16Jabalpur13Varanasi7SC6Panaji5Orissa2Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Bombay1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 260A17Section 143(3)15Section 6813Addition to Income13Section 14711Section 143(2)6Reopening of Assessment6Disallowance6Section 142(1)

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NAND KISHORE AGARWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/22/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL KOLKATA vs. RAJESH JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/26/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

Showing 1–20 of 50 · Page 1 of 3

5
Section 10(38)5
Penny Stock5
Section 143(1)4

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR PERIWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/136/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9, KOLKATA vs. PUSPA DEVI TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/150/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PR CIT 9, KOLKATA vs. MANISHA TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/155/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. JEMISH SHAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/57/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-SILIGURI vs. SHEKHAR AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/139/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. SRI SATYA NARAYAN SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/168/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9, KOLKATA vs. GITESH TIKMANI

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/154/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA KUMAR PARSURAMKA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/130/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SILIGURI vs. PRAKASHO DEVI SARIA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/138/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,BURDWAN vs. BIJAYA TAH

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/122/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, KOLKATA vs. MUKTA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/44/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MUKESH SARAOGI (HUF)

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/76/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18, KOLKATA vs. SRI VIKASH GOEL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/85/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5,KOLKATA vs. SWATI BAJAJ

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/6/2022HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-15, KOLKATA vs. SMT. BABITA AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/64/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA vs. POOJA JHUNJHUNWALA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/87/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA vs. SURAJ SAHANA

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/41/2020HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SILIGURI vs. NEETU AGARWAL

In the result, these appeals are allowed and the substantial

ITAT/3/2021HC Calcutta14 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

10 SCC 1 41 (2012) 341 ITR 1 (SC) 42 (2015) SCC Online Hyd. 1021 43 (1936) AC - 1 ITAT NO. 06 OF 2022 AND ETC. BATCH Page 50 of 150 Sahara India Versus CIT 44 and Kothari Filaments Versus CC 45. It is further submitted that in spite of specific request made by the assessee to provide the persons