BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,797Delhi1,274Jaipur327Chennai236Kolkata227Bangalore198Surat194Hyderabad147Chandigarh126Karnataka104Pune97Ahmedabad81Cochin59Visakhapatnam54Nagpur47Indore37Amritsar35Guwahati33Allahabad31Raipur30Rajkot28Patna26Cuttack22Jodhpur21Lucknow16Ranchi12Dehradun8Agra6Calcutta4Orissa2Panaji2Gauhati2Jabalpur2Rajasthan1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 260A5Addition to Income4Bogus Purchases3Search & Seizure3Section 143(3)2Section 69C2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. ADVANCE ENGINEERING CORPORATION

In the result, the appeal is allowed and the

ITAT/266/2024HC Calcutta09 Jun 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 9Th June, 2025.

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260ASection 69C

bogus purchases even after taking cognizance of the fact that the respondent assessee has failed to establish the genuineness of the purchases? b. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was justified in law to grant substantial relief to the respondent assessee by ignoring the findings of the search and seizure

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S BOSCON LEATHER PRODUCTS PVT LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITAT/69/2025HC Calcutta23 Apr 2025

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Dated : 23Rd April, 2025

Section 260A

bogus purchases despite the fact that the respondent assessee has failed to establish the genuineness of the purchases? ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned Tribunal was justified in law to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer by ignoring the search and seizure

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. ADVANCE ENGINEERING CORPORATION

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the revenue is allowed and the substantial

ITAT/272/2024HC Calcutta17 Jul 2025

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam

Section 143(3)Section 260A

bogus purchases even after taking cognizance of the fact that the assessee has failed to establish the genuineness of the actual purchases ? ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble ITAT has erred in law in allowing substantial relief to the assessee by ignoring the findings of the search 2 and seizure

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S JAJODIA FINANCE LIMITED

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the revenue is allowed

ITAT/2/2025HC Calcutta22 Jul 2025

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam

Section 143(1)Section 254Section 255Section 260A

search and seizure operation was carried out in the premises of KLJ Group and consequential survey had taken place in the office of the assessee at Kolkata. The director of the assessee Rajesh 4 Kumar Surana had given a statement on oath where he admitted that the assessee company’s entry operator had involved in giving bogus entry for purchase