BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 96clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,221Delhi1,197Bangalore535Chennai340Kolkata293Hyderabad187Indore163Ahmedabad146Karnataka128Chandigarh118Jaipur116Cochin77Pune73Raipur47Surat38Visakhapatnam33Cuttack30Rajkot28Lucknow24Nagpur18Agra17Ranchi17Jodhpur12Guwahati12Patna12Telangana11Amritsar5Panaji5Jabalpur3Kerala2Dehradun2Calcutta2Allahabad2SC2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 1473Section 260A2Section 1442Section 143(3)2Section 94(7)2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. DEBABRATA BANERJEE

Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed

ITAT/292/2024HC Calcutta18 Jul 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 18Th July, 2025.

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 260ASection 69A

Section 142(1) was issued and, subsequently, the case was transferred to the DCIT, Circle-34, Kolkata, who proceeded further for making the assessment. The said authority issued show cause notice dated 30.11.2015 calling upon the assessee to show cause on various issues concerning the assessment and the issues which were to be discussed included the issue relating

JET AGE SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-III

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the

ITA/79/2010HC Calcutta15 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Section 260ASection 94(7)

Section 94(7)(b) of the Act, had expired before the amendment was made by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 in respect of the units of mutual fund under consideration except in the case of units of M/s. Reliance Vision Fund in which the assessee incurred loss of Rs. 16,53,820/- and the dividend received