BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 70clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,402Delhi1,327Bangalore699Chennai524Kolkata321Ahmedabad202Hyderabad191Indore178Chandigarh162Cochin154Jaipur148Karnataka126Raipur110Pune81Surat57Cuttack53Lucknow43Rajkot38Visakhapatnam32Ranchi32Nagpur23Guwahati22Jodhpur20Kerala19Patna18Dehradun17Allahabad16Telangana14Varanasi13Agra13Amritsar11Jabalpur4SC3Panaji3Calcutta2Uttarakhand1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 1546Section 1994Section 260A2Section 94(7)2Section 143(1)2

SMT. CHETNA JAIN vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed and the order passed

ITAT/431/2016HC Calcutta20 Jul 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 20Th July, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. ….For Appellant. Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 199Section 203Section 260A

70,000/- and self-assessment tax of Rs.84,373/-. This mistake which was pointed out by the assessee was accepted by the assessing officer. Accordingly, the assessment under Section 143(1) of the Act stood rectified. The second mistake pointed out by the assessee with regard to credit of TDS

JET AGE SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-III

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the

ITA/79/2010HC Calcutta15 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Section 260ASection 94(7)

Section 94(7)(b) of the Act, had expired before the amendment was made by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 in respect of the units of mutual fund under consideration except in the case of units of M/s. Reliance Vision Fund in which the assessee incurred loss of Rs. 16,53,820/- and the dividend received