BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi972Mumbai834Patna472Bangalore416Pune338Cochin316Chennai308Kolkata194Indore182Karnataka120Ahmedabad116Hyderabad103Jaipur86Chandigarh60Raipur55Visakhapatnam41Lucknow39Nagpur37Rajkot27Dehradun26Jodhpur16Agra16Surat13Telangana10Amritsar9Cuttack7Guwahati7Jabalpur5SC4Panaji3Calcutta3Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2Ranchi1J&K1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 1547Section 143(3)6Section 260A4Section 1994Section 403Section 1473Section 143(1)2Section 1952TDS2

SMT. CHETNA JAIN vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed and the order passed

ITAT/431/2016HC Calcutta20 Jul 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 20Th July, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. ….For Appellant. Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 199Section 203Section 260A

TDS from the tax payable by her for the assessment year 2005-06. The appellate authority by order dated 18th November, 2013 dismissed the application on the ground that the plea raised by the assessee was beyond the scope of Section 154

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX -4, KOLKATA vs. M/S LINDE INDIA LIMITED

ITAT/338/2016
HC Calcutta
05 Sept 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 195Section 260ASection 40Section 5Section 50CSection 9

154 of the said Act and the total income was revised at Rs.172,19,20,000/-. In the order passed under Section 143(3)/154 dated 27.01.2011 the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was restricted to the extent of Rs.72,89,71,972/-. 6. The Assessee Company preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-XII, Kolkata

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. DEBABRATA BANERJEE

Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed

ITAT/292/2024HC Calcutta18 Jul 2025

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date : 18Th July, 2025.

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 260ASection 69A

Section 142(1) was issued and, subsequently, the case was transferred to the DCIT, Circle-34, Kolkata, who proceeded further for making the assessment. The said authority issued show cause notice dated 30.11.2015 calling upon the assessee to show cause on various issues concerning the assessment and the issues which were to be discussed included the issue relating