BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,797Mumbai1,771Bangalore1,054Chennai818Kolkata447Ahmedabad226Karnataka201Pune160Jaipur157Chandigarh156Hyderabad128Nagpur128Cochin111Indore87Lucknow82Raipur78Visakhapatnam52Rajkot31Surat30Cuttack27Jodhpur26Guwahati25Telangana24Amritsar23Dehradun17Patna13Agra12Ranchi11SC9Kerala8Rajasthan7Himachal Pradesh6Jabalpur6Panaji6Varanasi4Punjab & Haryana3Calcutta3Allahabad3J&K2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 260A3Section 206C3Addition to Income3Section 206C(6)2Section 206C(1)2Section 402Section 14A2TDS2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA -XX, KOLKATA vs. THE MAYFAIR HOSPITAL

The appeal stands dismissed and the substantial questions of law

ITA/56/2013HC Calcutta02 Mar 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 2Nd March, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. …For Appellant The Court : - This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30.5.2012 Passed By The Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata In I.T.A. No. 193/Kol/2012 For The Assessment Year 2008-2009. The Revenue Has Suggested The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration:- I) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Erred In Deleting The Addition Incurred By The Hospital For Doctor’S Charges, Pathology Charges, Doctor’S Fees & Commission Payment Under Section 40(A)(Ia) Read With Section 194 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961? Ii) Whether The Provision Can Exempt Those Deductors Who Make Payment To Its Clients Within A Previous Year But Not Comply With The Tds Provisions In Terms Of Chapter-Xvii-B Out Of Purview Of Section 40(A)(Ia) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ?

Section 194Section 260ASection 40Section 69C

exempt those deductors who make payment to its clients within a previous year but not comply with the TDS provisions

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S ITC LTD

ITAT/89/2025HC Calcutta21 Jul 2025

Bench: The Learned Tribunal – One By The Assessee & The Other By The Revenue Which Have Been Disposed Of By A Common Order, Impugned In This Appeal. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

For Appellant: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate
Section 14ASection 260ASection 37(1)Section 40a

TDS for information technology expense, information technology expense, patent registration charges, advances written off, excise duty debited to profit and loss account, disallowance under Section 40(a) for payment made for export commission, disallowance under Section 40(a) for payment made to foreign parties, bogus purchases, liquidated damages, income tax interest expense, commission to non-executive directors, disallowance under Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) , KOLKATA vs. NIRMAL KUMAR KEJRIWAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the

ITAT/376/2016HC Calcutta22 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Section 206CSection 206C(1)Section 206C(6)Section 260A

TDS) KOLKATA -Versus- NIRMAL KUMAR KEJRIWAL Appearance: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharyya, Adv. ...for the appellant. Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. ...for the respondent. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK Date : 22nd July, 2022. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income