BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Bogus Purchasesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai747Delhi394Kolkata164Chennai122Ahmedabad94Jaipur75Bangalore74Chandigarh60Cochin57Surat45Hyderabad45Indore35Nagpur26Raipur25Rajkot18Visakhapatnam18Guwahati17Lucknow17Amritsar16Jodhpur16Agra15Pune12Allahabad10Cuttack10Dehradun9Patna5Ranchi4Calcutta2Panaji2Jabalpur2Telangana1Varanasi1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 14A2Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA vs. M/S ITC LTD

ITAT/89/2025HC Calcutta21 Jul 2025

Bench: The Learned Tribunal – One By The Assessee & The Other By The Revenue Which Have Been Disposed Of By A Common Order, Impugned In This Appeal. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :

For Appellant: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate
Section 14ASection 260ASection 37(1)Section 40a

TDS for information technology expense, information technology expense, patent registration charges, advances written off, excise duty debited to profit and loss account, disallowance under Section 40(a) for payment made for export commission, disallowance under Section 40(a) for payment made to foreign parties, bogus purchases

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-14, KOLKATA vs. PKS HOLDINGS

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the question nos

ITAT/62/2017HC Calcutta03 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

purchased by the assessee was much before than the service rendered by the said party. The assessing officer pointed out the only evidence the assessee filed to justify the claim was the copy of the bill and TDS certificate and no evidence was brought on record to establish rendering of service by the party. The Inspector attached to the department