BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

153 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 145(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai561Delhi415Bangalore178Bombay153Chennai98Hyderabad98Chandigarh89Jaipur87Ahmedabad65Kolkata63Cochin60Raipur31Rajkot30Pune28Visakhapatnam27Surat24Agra19Jodhpur16Indore14Nagpur14SC13Lucknow12Cuttack8Allahabad3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Amritsar2Patna1

M/S. PIONEER PUBLICITY CORPORATION PVT. LTD. vs. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF PUNE AND ORS

IAST/14564/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

M/S. PIONEER PUBLICITY CORPORATION PVT. LTD. vs. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF PUNE AND ORS

WP/6882/2022HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

Showing 1–20 of 153 · Page 1 of 8

...

MANOJ MADHAV LIMAYE AND ORS vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS

IA/7703/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

SIXTH ELEMENT ADVERTISING PVT. LTD. THRU DIRECTOR, MR. CHANDRAKANT P KUDAL AND ORS vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU URBAN DEVELOPMENT DPT. THRU GP AND ORS

IA/437/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

RAHUL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING THROUGH ITS, PROPRIETOR AND ORS. vs. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .

WP/14845/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

PRANJAL ADVERTISING THR ITS PROPRIETOR AND ORS vs. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

WP/11476/2022HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

MANOJ MADHAV LIMAYE AND ORS vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS

WP/10684/2018HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

SPECTRUM ADVERTISING vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS

WP/5868/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

BALASHEB SHANKRRAO GANJVE AND ORS vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/9448/2021HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

RANJIT PRABHAKAR NAIK AND ORS vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/9134/2022HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

SANTOSH GANESH RANADE vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/9046/2022HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

MAKARAND PATANKAR vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/9045/2022HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

M/S. MANGALMURTI ADVERTISING THR. PARTNER YOUGESH U. MURKUTE vs. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

WP/8503/2022HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

RUSHIKESH SANJAY NIKAM vs. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

WP/7309/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

SIXTH ELEMENT ADVERTISING PVT. LTD. THRU DIRECTOR, MR. CHANDRAKANT P KUDAL AND ORS vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU URBAN DEVELOPMENT DPT. THRU GP AND ORS

WP/10717/2018HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

MANOJ MADHAV LIMAYE AND ORS vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS

IA/438/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

M/S. SHUBHANGI ADVERTISING vs. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

WP/3021/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

M/S. DIGVIJAY ADVERTISING AND ORS vs. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRU MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

WP/2241/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

KRUSHNA ADS THR ITS PROPRIETOR vs. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

WP/2126/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page

M/S. SPECTRUM ADVERTISING THR. VISHAL J. PALLOD vs. STATE OF MAHA. THR. PRIN. SEC. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS

IA/13267/2023HC Bombay10 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Section 5 of the GST Compensation to States Act 2017 with effect from 1 July, 2017. Thus, the impugned resolution of the Pune Municipal Corporation dated 28 September, 2018 was a nullity for want of competence and the purported “ex post facto 9 AIR 2022 SC 336 10 (1986) 1 SCC 264 11 (2010) 3 SCC 616 PVR/PSV/VSA Page