RAMESH HARIBHAU GAWALI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER - I AHMEDNAGAR
The appeal stands dismissed
ITA/29/2019HC Bombay04 Jan 2024
Bench: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260
business establishments and they have neither encashed the
cheques from the bank, nor received the amount from third parties i.e. to
the extent of Rs.13,10,000/- as it was claimed by the appellant that he has
spent that amount on purchase of marble. It was found that the expenses
incurred were bogus expenses. We have made inquiry with
