BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 44Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi51Mumbai40Dehradun6Bangalore5Kolkata3Indore1SC1

Key Topics

Section 10A22Section 201(1)5Section 1954Section 2014Section 9(1)(vii)3Deduction3Exemption2Set Off of Losses2Carry Forward of Losses2

M/S UNISYS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

ITA 67/BANG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Sept 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Abraham P. George

For Appellant: Shri Kanchan Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.R.Reddy, CIT(DR)
Section 10A

44D are to be applied to each undertaking and not each business. This is because, section 10A is undertaking specific. That, the section is undertaking specific is discernible from the following :- • “Under sub-section 1 profits derived by the undertaking from the export of articles and things qualify for deduction; • Sub-section 2 prescribes certain conditions to be fulfilled

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S UNISYS INDIA (P) LIMITED, BANGALORE

ITA 70/BANG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Sept 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Abraham P. George

For Appellant: Shri Kanchan Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.R.Reddy, CIT(DR)
Section 10A

44D are to be applied to each undertaking and not each business. This is because, section 10A is undertaking specific. That, the section is undertaking specific is discernible from the following :- • “Under sub-section 1 profits derived by the undertaking from the export of articles and things qualify for deduction; • Sub-section 2 prescribes certain conditions to be fulfilled

M/S FOODWORLD SUPERMARKETS LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DY. DIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1356/BANG/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Oct 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijaypal Rao & Shri Jason P Boazita Nos.1356 & 1357/Bang/2013 (Asst. Year – 2008-09) M/S Food World Supermarkets Ltd., No.740, Eshwari Industrial Estate, Gate No.2, Hulimavu, Bannergatta Road, Bangalore-560 076. . Appellant Vs. The Dy. Director Of Income-Tax, (International Taxation) Circle-I(1), Bangalore. . Respondent Appellant By : Shri Padam Chand Khincha, Ca Respondent By : Shri Saravanan B, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 15-09-2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 28-10-2015 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saravanan B, JCIT
Section 192Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 9(1)(vii)

44D of the Act. In support of his contention, he has relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble SC in the case of CIT Vs. Morgan Stanley and Co. Inc., 292 ITR 416 and submitted that while interpreting the definition of PE as provided u/s 92F(iii) as well as considering the CBDT Circular

INTEL CORPORATION,BANGALORE vs. DY. DIR I.T., BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1486/BANG/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Sept 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri Koushik Muharjee, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Swapna Das, JCIT (D.R)
Section 9(1)(vii)

transfer pricing exercise) cannot negate the nature of the transaction. It would lead to an absurd conclusion if, all else constant, the fact that no payment is demanded negates accrual of income to the overseas entity. Instead, the various factors concerning the determination of the real employment link continue to operate, and the consequent finding that provision of employees

FLUGHAFEN ZURICH AG,BANGALORE vs. DDIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 1525/BANG/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Sampath Raghunathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT -2 & Smt. Swapna Das, JCIT-2
Section 143(3)

transfer pricing exercise) cannot negate the nature of the transaction. It would lead to an absurd conclusion if, all else constant, the fact that no payment is demanded negates accrual of income to the overseas entity. Instead, the various factors concerning the determination of the real employment link continue to operate, and the consequent finding that provision of employees