BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 271Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai88Delhi39Ahmedabad20Chennai9Pune5Bangalore4Surat3Hyderabad3Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 271G4Transfer Pricing4Section 143(3)3Section 144C2Section 92A2Section 92E2Penalty2TP Method2Addition to Income2

NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 146/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jul 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Abraham P.George

For Appellant: Shri Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Ravichandran, CIT-III (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92ASection 92E

section 40(a) was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004. 26. The learned counsel for the Assessee brought to our notice that a certificate in Form No.26A of the Rules had already been filed before the AO and DRP. The said Certificate in Form No.26A of a Chartered Accountant is a certificate certifying that TPL has paid

ALCON LABORATORIES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(1)(4), BANGALORE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed as indicated herein above

ITA 726/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. B.R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 726/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Alcon Laboratories (India) The Deputy Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner Of 11Th Floor, Rmz Azure, Income Tax, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Circle – 1(1)(1), Bangalore – 560 092. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aacca3430F Appellant Respondent : Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Assessee By Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Cit Revenue By (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 12-04-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 23/01/2017 Passed By The Ld.Ito, Ward-1(1)(4), Bangalore For Assessment Year 2012-13 On Following Revised Grounds Of Appeal: “Based On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, Alcon Laboratories (India) Private Limited (Hereinafter Referred To As "Appellant”), Respectfully Craves Leave To Prefer An Appeal Against The Order Passed By The Learned Assessing Officer [Hereinafter Referred To As The "Learned Ao”] In Pursuance To The Directions Issued By Hon'Ble

For Respondent: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr
Section 143(3)Section 144C

price as permitted to the Appellant under the provisions of Section 92C(2) of the Act. General Grounds 23. The learned AO has erred. in law and in facts, by levying interest under section 234A and 234B of the Act: Page 5 of 20 IT(TP)A No. 726/Bang/2017 24. The learned AO erred, in law and in facts

M/S TELSIMA COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2099/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Smt. Vaidehi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri M. Rajasekhar, Addl.CIT (D.R)
Section 271GSection 92CSection 92D

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) by the ACIT, Circle 12(4), Bangalore and whereas TP Study was conducted by the TPO and passed the order under Section 92CA of the Act on 27.01.2016. Further, the TPO has issued Notice Dt.30.11.2015 to submit the International 3 Transactions entered by the assessee with its Associated Enterprises (AE). After due correspondence with the assessee

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S ESSENTRA INDIA PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 311/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Mar 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (DR) (ITAT)-2, BengaluruFor Respondent: Shri T.Suryanarayana, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 271G

Section 271G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') for not maintaining proper document. He has relied upon the order of the TPO. 5. On the other hand, the learned Authorised Representative has submitted that an identical issue has been repeatedly considered and decided by this Tribunal for the Assessment Years