MFAR HOLDINGS PVT. LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. PR. CIT, BANGALORE
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 634/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2015AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri. N. V. Vasudevan & Shri. Abraham P. George
For Appellant: Shri. Cherian K Baby, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sunil Kumar Agarwala, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 269Section 271DSection 45(2)
269T of the Act.
07. However, Pr. CIT was not impressed with the above reply. According to him, business loss claimed on the sale of the property was only for the purpose of taking advantage of Section 45(2) of the Act, thereby inflating the cost of asset to the fair market value. As per the Pr. CIT, there