CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 390/BANG/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Aug 2023AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu
For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, CIT-2(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 92C
Pricing documentation despite Rule 10B(4) of the Rules providing for the use of such data.
9. The learned TPO/ Learned AO erred in applying export earning filter of 25% of the total sales, leading to a narrower set of comparable companies.
10. The learned TPO/ Learned AO/ Hon'ble DRP erred in not applying the upper limit on turnover