BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 272A(2)(k)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai37Karnataka21Jaipur15Ahmedabad10Delhi9Mumbai8Pune6Chandigarh5Lucknow3Bangalore2SC1Cuttack1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 272A(2)(e)3Section 142(1)3Section 12A2Penalty2

SREE RAJENDRA SURI GURUMANDIR TRUST ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,(EXEMPTION) WARD-3,, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2020/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year : 2015-16 Sree Rajendrasuri Gurumandir Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), 25 & 25/1, Jain Temple Road, Ward – 3, Vishwweswarapuram, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 004. Pan : Aajts 8921 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Suman Lunkar, Ar. Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 28.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 04.12.2024 O R D E R Per Laxmi Prasad Sahuthis Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) [Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1056681273 (1)] Dated 30.09.2023. 2. The Sole & Substantiating Ground Raised By The Assessee To Challenge Order Of Nfac Confirming The Penalty Levied By The Ao Of Rs.54,700/- Under Section 272A(2)(E) Of The Act, For Delay In Filing The Return Of Income. The Due Date For Filing Return Of Income Was 30.09.2015 But The Assessee Filed Its Return On 31.03.2017. Accordingly, Ao Levied Penalty Under Section 272A(2)(E) Of The Act Of Rs.54,700/-. Page 2 Of 9 3. At The Outset Of Hearing, The Learned Counsel Drew Our Attention That The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Barred By 328 Days. However, The Registry Has Not Raised Any Defect Memo For Delay In Filing The Appeal. An Application Dated 22.11.2024 Has Been Filed By The Assessee Stating Therein The Reasons For Delay In Filing The Assessee Which Is As Under:

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 12ASection 139
Section 143(1)
Section 272A(2)(e)
Section 275(1)(c)

K APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Smt. Suman Lunkar, AR. Revenue by : Shri. Subramanian, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 28.11.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 04.12.2024 O R D E R Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member This appeal is filed by the assessee against the Order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) [DIN and Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1056681273

SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1140/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2021-22

For Respondent: Shri Prasanna N Urala
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144BSection 263Section 272A(1)(d)

K., JUDICIAL MEMBER This is an appeal filed by the assessee challenging the revisional order passed u/s. 263 of the Act by the Ld.PCIT, Bengaluru – 1 dated 20/03/2025 in respect of the A.Y. 2021-22 and raised the following grounds: “1. The impugned order dated 20.03.2025 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) under section