BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka21Mumbai19Ahmedabad15Chennai8Delhi7Bangalore6Kolkata3Nagpur1Indore1Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 14A45Section 143(3)6Addition to Income6Section 2505Section 1325Disallowance5Section 92A2Section 92E2

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 216/BANG/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Rishabh Singhvi
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

271G of the Act without appreciating the varying scope of operation of these provisions. 13. The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution or otherwise, the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or during the hearing of the appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case are as under: The assessee filed return of income

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 214/BANG/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Dec 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Rishabh Singhvi
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

271G of the Act without appreciating the varying scope of operation of these provisions. 13. The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution or otherwise, the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or during the hearing of the appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case are as under: The assessee filed return of income

M/S M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 215/BANG/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Rishabh Singhvi
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

271G of the Act without appreciating the varying scope of operation of these provisions. 13. The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution or otherwise, the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or during the hearing of the appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case are as under: The assessee filed return of income

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 217/BANG/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Rishabh Singhvi
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

271G of the Act without appreciating the varying scope of operation of these provisions. 13. The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution or otherwise, the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or during the hearing of the appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case are as under: The assessee filed return of income

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 218/BANG/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Dec 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Rishabh Singhvi
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

271G of the Act without appreciating the varying scope of operation of these provisions. 13. The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution or otherwise, the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or during the hearing of the appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case are as under: The assessee filed return of income

NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 146/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jul 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Abraham P.George

For Appellant: Shri Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Ravichandran, CIT-III (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92ASection 92E

section 40(a) was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004. 26. The learned counsel for the Assessee brought to our notice that a certificate in Form No.26A of the Rules had already been filed before the AO and DRP. The said Certificate in Form No.26A of a Chartered Accountant is a certificate certifying that TPL has paid